Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koretz, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Carter, S. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Koretz, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Carter, S. K.

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 1, 640-644, Copyright © 1983 by American Society of Clinical Oncology


ARTICLES

A comparison of the quality of participation of community affiliates and that of universities in the Northern California Oncology Group

MM Koretz, PM Jackson, FM Torti and SK Carter

The quality of participation in the performance of clinical trials of university members and community affiliates of the Northern California Oncology Group is evaluated and compared. The data, based on 738 patients on 33 protocols, were collected during a one year period, July 1, 1980--June 30, 1981. The comparisons are made on three types of criteria: accrual distribution, with respect to study phase and modality multiplicity; data quality, generally reflecting protocol adherence; and data completeness. The performance of the community affiliates was found to equal or surpass that of the university members in most measures. Therefore, it is concluded that the community affiliates are functioning as full and valuable participants in the Northern California Oncology Group.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
Submacular Surgery Trials Research Group
Clinical Trial Performance of Community- vs University-Based Practices in the Submacular Surgery Trials (SST): SST Report No. 2
Arch Ophthalmol, June 1, 2004; 122(6): 857 - 863.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 1983 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online