Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ansfield, F. J.
Right arrow Articles by Singson, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ansfield, F. J.
Right arrow Articles by Singson, J. P.

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 1, 107-110, Copyright © 1983 by American Society of Clinical Oncology


ARTICLES

Phase I-II studies of oral tegafur (ftorafur)

FJ Ansfield, GJ Kallas and JP Singson

A total of 65 patients with advanced colorectal or breast cancer were given oral tegafur in the phase I study. Of these, 28 patients had accurately measurable lesions and were entered into the phase II study. Patients with liver metastasis, compromised bone marrow, or a decreased oral intake to less than 50% of their normal intake were given a poor- risk schedule consisting of 0.75 g/m2/day divided into 4 doses/day X 28 day unless early toxicity developed. In the absence of any of the above deficits, patients were given a good-risk schedule of 1.25 g/m2/day X 21 days if no toxicity appeared. The courses were followed by a 2-3-wk rest period depending upon the speed to recovery from all reactions and then repeated. Compared with 5-FU, nausea and vomiting occurred more frequently with tegafur while hematologic toxicity was less common and less severe. The paucity of significant hematologic toxicity permitted courses of this drug to be given safely on an outpatient basis even to the point of slight reaction for optimal dosing. No serious reactions occurred in any of the 65 patients. The clinical results showed partial regressions in 6 of 21 colorectal cancer patients and 3 of 7 breast cancer patients. Six of the 9 responses occurred in patients who had previous 5-FU trials. The average duration of regression in the colorectal cancer patients on oral tegafur was 9 mo with a significantly increased survival of the responders.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
E. B. Lamont and R. L. Schilsky
The Oral Fluoropyrimidines in Cancer Chemotherapy
Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 1999; 5(9): 2289 - 2296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
C. L. Vogel and J.-M. Nabholtz
Monotherapy of Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Review of Newer Agents
Oncologist, February 1, 1999; 4(1): 17 - 33.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
P. M. Hoff and R. Pazdur
UFT Plus Oral Leucovorin: A New Oral Treatment for Colorectal Cancer
Oncologist, June 1, 1998; 3(3): 155 - 164.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 1983 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online