Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Green, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Freeman, A. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Green, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Freeman, A. I.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Article

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 1, 111-116, Copyright © 1983 by American Society of Clinical Oncology


ARTICLES

The use of different induction and maintenance chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of advanced yolk sac tumors

DM Green, ML Brecher, M Grossi, L Simpson, JE Fisher, JE Allen, DR Cooney, TC Jewett Jr and AI Freeman

Four children with yolk sac tumor were treated with an aggressive combination chemotherapy program. Three children had presacral primary tumors, one having pulmonary metastases, and one had a testicular primary tumor with pulmonary metastases. Three children were treated when they had measurable disease, and one had no measurable disease. The chemotherapy program consisted of a 6-wk induction period with vincristine (VCR), cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (DDP), and bleomycin. Maintenance therapy consisted of VCR, actinomycin D, and cyclophosphamide (cytoxan) every 3-4 wk as tolerated. Treatment was discontinued after 12 mo of complete remission. All three patients with evaluable disease had a partial response (PR) to induction therapy. Two underwent surgical exploration following induction therapy, one a laparotomy and the other a thoracotomy, and were found to have only scar tissue at the sites of presumed residual disease. The third child with measurable disease progressed to a clinical complete response (CR) during maintenance therapy. Two patients have had no evidence of disease (NED) for 42+ and 41+ mo since starting therapy (28+ and 27+ mo since completing treatment). Two patients are NED 11+ and 7+ mo since starting therapy and remain on treatment. We have encountered no significant renal or pulmonary toxicity, and there have been only two hospitalizations during maintenance therapy for fever and neutropenia. These preliminary results employing different induction and maintenance chemotherapy programs and planned second-look surgical intervention appear encouraging.

Related Article

  • Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Children and Adolescents With Malignant Germ Cell Tumors
    Daniel M. Green
    JCO 2008 26: 3297-3298 [Full Text]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
D. M. Green
Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Children and Adolescents With Malignant Germ Cell Tumors
J. Clin. Oncol., July 10, 2008; 26(20): 3297 - 3298.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
S. D. Fossa, E. Gilbert, G. M. Dores, J. Chen, K. A. McGlynn, S. Schonfeld, H. Storm, P. Hall, E. Holowaty, A. Andersen, et al.
Noncancer Causes of Death in Survivors of Testicular Cancer
J Natl Cancer Inst, April 4, 2007; 99(7): 533 - 544.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 1983 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online