Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 1, 164-169, Copyright © 1983 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
Guidelines for publishing papers on cancer clinical trials: responsibilities of editors and authors
M Zelen
Guidelines are proposed for the reporting of clinical trials. These are
meant to be used for both authors and journal editors. Specific proposals
are made for: reporting the population under study, actual therapy used,
describing the study design, accounting of patients, follow-up statistics,
and describing the quality control of the data. Nonrandomized studies
require special discussion. Such studies potentially have substantial
biases which can lead to incorrect conclusions. Six areas of biases arising
in nonrandomized studies are pointed out which should require a discussion
in an acceptable published paper. The presentation of statistical results
and the reporting of early studies present unusually difficult problems.
Guidelines are presented for statistical analyses which, although simple to
implement in practice, are not generally used. A proposal is made for the
publication of early results of a study which require that the authors
agree to follow and periodically report on their trial to the journal
editor. If the early conclusions change with additional follow-up, the
editor should notify its readers. The adoption of these guidelines can be
an important force in raising the scientific level of the reporting of
clinical trials.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Mathoulin-Pelissier, S. Gourgou-Bourgade, F. Bonnetain, and A. Kramar
Survival End Point Reporting in Randomized Cancer Clinical Trials: A Review of Major Journals
J. Clin. Oncol.,
August 1, 2008;
26(22):
3721 - 3726.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Lang
Documenting research in scientific articles: guidelines for authors: reporting research designs and activities.
Chest,
October 1, 2006;
130(4):
1263 - 1268.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. P. Treon, M. A. Gertz, M. Dimopoulos, A. Anagnostopoulos, J. Blade, A. R. Branagan, R. Garcia-Sanz, S. Johnson, E. Kimby, V. LeBlond, et al.
Update on treatment recommendations from the Third International Workshop on Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia
Blood,
May 1, 2006;
107(9):
3442 - 3446.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Freidlin, O. S. Breathnach, and B. E. Johnson
A Model to Select Regimens for Phase III Trials for Patients with Advanced-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res.,
March 1, 2003;
9(3):
917 - 922.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. J. Miner, D. P. Jaques, and C. D. Shriver
A Prospective Evaluation of Patients Undergoing Surgery for the Palliation of an Advanced Malignancy
Ann. Surg. Oncol.,
August 1, 2002;
9(7):
696 - 703.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Dooley and J. Vernon
Reproducibility of treatment methodologies detailed in contemporary clinical trial reports
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice,
June 1, 2000;
6(2):
50 - 54.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Moher
CONSORT: An Evolving Tool to Help Improve the Quality of Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials
JAMA,
May 13, 1998;
279(18):
1489 - 1491.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A. Hokanson, C. M. Stiernberg, M. S. McCracken, and F. B. Quinn Jr
The Reporting of Statistical Techniques in Otolaryngology Journals
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,
January 1, 1987;
113(1):
45 - 50.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|