Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 10, 134-142, Copyright © 1992 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
Comparative study of pamidronate disodium and etidronate disodium in the treatment of cancer-related hypercalcemia
R Gucalp, P Ritch, PH Wiernik, PR Sarma, A Keller, SP Richman, K Tauer, J Neidhart, LE Mallette and R Siegel
Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center, Department of Oncology, Bronx, NY 10467.
PURPOSE: This multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial was performed to
determine the efficacy and safety of pamidronate disodium (APD) in
comparison to etidronate disodium (EHDP) in the treatment of cancer-
related hypercalcemia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-five male and female
adult patients with cancer and corrected calcium levels of greater than or
equal to 12.0 mg/dL after 24 hours of hydration were randomized to receive
either 60 mg APD given as a single 24-hour infusion or 7.5 mg/kg EHDP given
as a 2-hour infusion daily for 3 days. RESULTS: APD normalized corrected
calcium levels in 70% (21 of 30) of patients, whereas EHDP did so in 41%
(14 of 34) of patients (P = .026). The mean corrected serum calcium level
decreased from 14.6 to 10.5 mg/dL in the APD-treated group and from 13.8 to
11.6 mg/dL in the EHDP-treated group within the first week of treatment.
There was no difference in response to APD in patients without versus those
with bone metastases (78% v 67%). Both drugs were well tolerated.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that a single 60-mg infusion of APD is
safe and more effective than EHDP given at the dose of 7.5 mg/kg for 3 days
in the treatment of cancer-related hypercalcemia.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. A Licata
Discovery, Clinical Development, and Therapeutic Uses of Bisphosphonates
Ann. Pharmacother.,
April 1, 2005;
39(4):
668 - 677.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. F. Stewart
Hypercalcemia Associated with Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med.,
January 27, 2005;
352(4):
373 - 379.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Berenson and R. Hirschberg
Safety and Convenience of a 15-Minute Infusion of Zoledronic Acid
Oncologist,
June 1, 2004;
9(3):
319 - 329.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Wilhelm, V. Kunzmann, S. Eckstein, P. Reimer, F. Weissinger, T. Ruediger, and H.-P. Tony
{gamma}{delta} T cells for immune therapy of patients with lymphoid malignancies
Blood,
July 1, 2003;
102(1):
200 - 206.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Major
The Use of Zoledronic Acid, a Novel, Highly Potent Bisphosphonate, for the Treatment of Hypercalcemia of Malignancy
Oncologist,
December 1, 2002;
7(6):
481 - 491.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. R. Berenson, R. A. Vescio, L. S. Rosen, J. M. VonTeichert, M. Woo, R. Swift, A. Savage, E. Givant, M. Hupkes, H. Harvey, et al.
A Phase I Dose-ranging Trial of Monthly Infusions of Zoledronic Acid for the Treatment of Osteolytic Bone Metastases
Clin. Cancer Res.,
March 1, 2001;
7(3):
478 - 485.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Major, A. Lortholary, J. Hon, E. Abdi, G. Mills, H. D. Menssen, F. Yunus, R. Bell, J. Body, E. Quebe-Fehling, et al.
Zoledronic Acid Is Superior to Pamidronate in the Treatment of Hypercalcemia of Malignancy: A Pooled Analysis of Two Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trials
J. Clin. Oncol.,
January 15, 2001;
19(2):
558 - 567.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. N. Rosen, A. C. Moses, J. Garber, D. S. Ross, S. L. Lee, L. Ferguson, V. Chen, K. Lee, and S. L. Greenspan
Randomized Trial of Pamidronate in Patients with Thyroid Cancer: Bone Density Is Not Reduced by Suppressive Doses of Thyroxine, But Is Increased by Cyclic Intravenous Pamidronate
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.,
July 1, 1998;
83(7):
2324 - 2330.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. A. Guise and G. R. Mundy
Cancer and Bone
Endocr. Rev.,
February 1, 1998;
19(1):
18 - 54.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
|