Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MacKenzie, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Meyers, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MacKenzie, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Meyers, F.

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 10, 1769-1774, Copyright © 1992 by American Society of Clinical Oncology


ARTICLES

Consolidation hemibody radiotherapy following induction combination chemotherapy in high-tumor-burden multiple myeloma

MR MacKenzie, H Wold, C George, D Gandara, G Ray, S Schiff, J Shields, R Artim, H Davidson and F Meyers
Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento 95817.

PURPOSE: Curative therapy for multiple myeloma continues to be an elusive goal. This report discusses the Northern California Oncology Group (NCOG) phase I and II trial in high-tumor-burden disease that used a strategy that consisted of induction chemotherapy (vincristine, melphalan, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone [VMCP]) for eight cycles followed by sequential hemibody radiation therapy (RT) and subsequent chemotherapy for an additional eight cycles. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-two previously untreated stage III myeloma patients were entered onto the study. Sixty-nine received induction chemotherapy, 40 received induction chemotherapy and hemibody RT, and 23 received induction chemotherapy, hemibody RT, and consolidative chemotherapy. RESULTS: Twenty-two complete responses (CRs) were obtained by induction chemotherapy, with four additional CRs after RT and consolidative chemotherapy. Nineteen patients developed grade 4 hematologic toxicity primarily after upper hemibody RT. Eight of these developed long- standing neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. Median survival of the group was 134 weeks, which was not significantly different from other approaches. CONCLUSIONS: Hemibody RT can be combined with chemotherapy as induction therapy and can be safely administered in a community setting. However, as administered here no survival advantage was demonstrated.




About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 1992 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online