Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Rijswijk, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Pinedo, H. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Rijswijk, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Pinedo, H. M.

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 10, 1788-1794, Copyright © 1992 by American Society of Clinical Oncology


ARTICLES

Suramin: rapid loading and weekly maintenance regimens for cancer patients

RE van Rijswijk, AC van Loenen, J Wagstaff, E Meijer, R Lopez, CJ van Groeningen, JJ Heimans and HM Pinedo
Department of Medical Oncology, Free University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

PURPOSE: Suramin is an anticancer agent with a narrow therapeutic window and a terminal half-life of 45 to 55 days. These characteristics make it necessary to control accurately the serum concentrations of the drug. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to develop a rapid loading regimen, followed by weekly administration of suramin to maintain serum concentrations of between 150 and 300 micrograms/mL for 8 weeks. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were treated with five different loading regimens. Initially, weekly maintenance doses were estimated manually by the treating physician. Subsequently, computer- assisted dosing that used Bayesian pharmacokinetic modeling was used. RESULTS: Thirty-eight courses of suramin that were administered to 35 patients were studied. The optimal loading regimen consisted of a continuous infusion of 600 mg/m2 during a 24-hour period, which resulted in a mean serum concentration of 319 micrograms/mL. Potentially toxic concentrations that were observed with shorter infusions were avoided. Maintenance treatment, which used the weekly administration of suramin during a 6-hour period, seemed to be able to maintain mean suramin serum trough concentrations of 150 micrograms/mL, while preventing mean peak concentrations of more than 300 micrograms/mL. The use of Bayesian pharmacokinetics was superior to manual estimation in tailoring the optimal dose to the therapeutic window. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous infusion is the optimal way of delivering suramin during the loading phase. To maintain trough levels and peak levels within a narrower therapeutic window, suramin will have to be administered more frequently than once a week. Bayesian modeling based on individual serum levels and population pharmacokinetics allows accurate dosing to maintain suramin levels within the therapeutic window.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. A. Villalona-Calero, M. G. Wientjes, G. A. Otterson, S. Kanter, D. Young, A. J. Murgo, B. Fischer, C. DeHoff, D. Chen, T.-K. Yeh, et al.
Phase I Study of Low-Dose Suramin as a Chemosensitizer in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2003; 9(9): 3303 - 3311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 1992 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online