Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 10, 1810-1816, Copyright © 1992 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
Ethical issues in phase I oncology research: a comparison of investigators and institutional review board chairpersons
E Kodish, C Stocking, MJ Ratain, A Kohrman and M Siegler
Department of Pediatrics, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, IL.
PURPOSE: Phase I research trials assess the safety of agents never before
administered to humans. In the field of oncology, this practice raises
several important ethical questions. We examined the ethics of these trials
by surveying phase I oncology investigators and institutional review board
(IRB) chairpersons at major cancer research centers around the country.
METHODS: Questionnaires were mailed to 78 investigators and 47 chairpersons
to obtain their views on the ethical propriety of conducting phase I
oncology research, and on institutional practice regarding these trials.
The response rate was 68% in each group. RESULTS: The majority of each
group reported that phase I oncology trials face no more scrutiny or
resistance in their institution's IRB process than other research
protocols. Nevertheless, IRB chairpersons were more likely than
investigators to favor special procedural safeguards to protect subjects in
phase I oncology trials. Nearly all respondents agreed that although actual
medical benefit was very uncommon, most patients entered for a chance at a
therapeutic effect. Investigators were more likely than chairpersons to
report that patients obtained psychologic benefit from participation in
phase I trials. CONCLUSION: Although individual IRB chairpersons and
oncology investigators may have important differences of opinion concerning
the ethics of phase I trials, these disagreements do not represent a
widespread area of ethical conflict in clinical research.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Lee, A. Lim, A. Lalvani, M. J. L. Descamps, R. Leonard, S. Nallamala, J. S. Lewis, R. C. Coombes, and J. Stebbing
The clinical significance of radiologically detected silent pulmonary nodules in early breast cancer
Ann. Onc.,
December 1, 2008;
19(12):
2001 - 2006.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Italiano, C. Massard, R. Bahleda, A.-L. Vataire, E. Deutsch, N. Magne, J.-P. Pignon, G. Vassal, J.-P. Armand, and J.-C. Soria
Treatment outcome and survival in participants of phase I oncology trials carried out from 2003 to 2006 at Institut Gustave Roussy
Ann. Onc.,
April 1, 2008;
19(4):
787 - 792.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Agulnik, A. M. Oza, G. R. Pond, and L. L. Siu
Impact and Perceptions of Mandatory Tumor Biopsies for Correlative Studies in Clinical Trials of Novel Anticancer Agents
J. Clin. Oncol.,
October 20, 2006;
24(30):
4801 - 4807.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Agrawal, C. Grady, D. L. Fairclough, N. J. Meropol, K. Maynard, and E. J. Emanuel
Patients' Decision-Making Process Regarding Participation in Phase I Oncology Research
J. Clin. Oncol.,
September 20, 2006;
24(27):
4479 - 4484.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Markman
"Therapeutic intent" in phase 1 oncology trials: a justifiable objective.
Arch Intern Med,
July 24, 2006;
166(14):
1446 - 1448.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J Kimmelman and N Palmour
Therapeutic optimism in the consent forms of phase 1 gene transfer trials: an empirical analysis
J. Med. Ethics,
April 1, 2005;
31(4):
209 - 214.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Horstmann, M. S. McCabe, L. Grochow, S. Yamamoto, L. Rubinstein, T. Budd, D. Shoemaker, E. J. Emanuel, and C. Grady
Risks and Benefits of Phase 1 Oncology Trials, 1991 through 2002
N. Engl. J. Med.,
March 3, 2005;
352(9):
895 - 904.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. G. Roberts Jr, B. H. Goulart, L. Squitieri, S. C. Stallings, E. F. Halpern, B. A. Chabner, G. S. Gazelle, S. N. Finkelstein, and J. W. Clark
Trends in the Risks and Benefits to Patients With Cancer Participating in Phase 1 Clinical Trials
JAMA,
November 3, 2004;
292(17):
2130 - 2140.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Chang
Nurses' Perceptions of Phase I Clinical Trials in Pediatric Oncology: A Review of the Literature
Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing,
November 1, 2004;
21(6):
343 - 349.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Agrawal and E. J. Emanuel
Ethics of Phase 1 Oncology Studies: Reexamining the Arguments and Data
JAMA,
August 27, 2003;
290(8):
1075 - 1082.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Byock and S. H. Miles
Hospice Benefits and Phase I Cancer Trials
Ann Intern Med,
February 18, 2003;
138(4):
335 - 337.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Horng, E. J. Emanuel, B. Wilfond, J. Rackoff, K. Martz, and C. Grady
Descriptions of Benefits and Risks in Consent Forms for Phase 1 Oncology Trials
N. Engl. J. Med.,
December 26, 2002;
347(26):
2134 - 2140.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. E. M. van Luijn, A. W. Musschenga, R. B. Keus, W. M. Robinson, and N. K. Aaronson
Assessment of the risk/benefit ratio of phase II cancer clinical trials by Institutional Review Board (IRB) members
Ann. Onc.,
August 1, 2002;
13(8):
1307 - 1313.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A. Deatrick, D. B. Angst, and C. Moore
Parents' Views of their Children's Participation in Phase I Oncology Clinical Trials
Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing,
July 1, 2002;
19(4):
114 - 121.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. C. Lintz, R. T. Penson, B. A. Chabner, S. Mack, and T. J. Lynch Jr.
A Staff Dialogue on Phase I Trials: Psychosocial Issues Faced by Patients, Their Families, and Caregivers
Oncologist,
June 1, 2002;
7(90002):
8 - 15.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Joffe, E. F. Cook, P. D. Cleary, J. W. Clark, and J. C. Weeks
Quality of Informed Consent: a New Measure of Understanding Among Research Subjects
J Natl Cancer Inst,
January 17, 2001;
93(2):
139 - 147.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. J L Edwards, R J Lilford, and J Hewison
The ethics of randomised controlled trials from the perspectives of patients, the public, and healthcare professionals
BMJ,
October 31, 1998;
317(7167):
1209 - 1212.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. C. Lintz, R. T. Penson, B. A. Chabner, S. Mack, and T. J. Lynch
A Staff Dialogue on Phase I Trials: Psychosocial Issues Faced by Patients, Their Families, and Caregivers
Oncologist,
October 1, 1998;
3(5):
357 - 364.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
|