Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Jong, J.
Right arrow Articles by van der Vijgh, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Jong, J.
Right arrow Articles by van der Vijgh, W. J.

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 10, 1897-1906, Copyright © 1992 by American Society of Clinical Oncology


ARTICLES

Plasma pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a new prodrug N-l- leucyldoxorubicin and its metabolites in a phase I clinical trial

J de Jong, GJ Geijssen, CN Munniksma, JB Vermorken and WJ van der Vijgh
Department of Oncology, Free University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

PURPOSE: N-l-leucyldoxorubicin (Leu-Dox) was developed as a prodrug of doxorubicin (Dox) to circumvent the cardiotoxicity associated with repeated administration of Dox. Our purpose was to assess the pharmacokinetics of Leu-Dox, Dox, doxorubicinol (Dol) and four other metabolites for pharmacokinetically guided dose-escalation and to verify the prodrug character of Leu-Dox. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Blood and urine of 14 patients were sampled during the phase I clinical trial and analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography. Dose levels of Leu-Dox ranged from 18 mg/m2 to 225 mg/m2, the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD). Hematologic parameters were monitored regularly in each patient. RESULTS: Leu-Dox was rapidly distributed (half-life at alpha phase [t1/2 alpha] = 2.5 +/- 0.6 minutes) followed by a biphasic elimination (half-life at beta phase [t1/2 beta] = 17.4 +/- 7.3 minutes; half-life at gamma phase [t1/2 gamma] = 1.5 +/- 0.5 hours), as measured over the first 12 hours after administration. In three patients, in whom Leu-Dox was found in the plasma for up to 48 hours after injection, a final elimination half-life (t1/2,elim) of 16 hours was observed. The t1/2,elim of Leu-Dox was short (0.6 to 16.5 hours) compared with the t1/2,elim of Dox (38 +/- 11 hours). The mean residence time and apparent volume of distribution were 23 +/- 5 minutes and 19 +/- 6 L/m2, respectively. Only 1.5% to 5% of the dose was excreted in the urine over 48 hours, with Dox as major constituent. Dox was rapidly formed, reaching its maximum concentration within 10 minutes after the end of Leu-Dox infusion. Areas under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC infinity, mean +/- SD, n = 16) of Leu-Dox, Dox, and Dol were 115 +/- 27 mumol.min/L, 41 +/- 12 mumol.min/L, and 33 +/- 14 mumol.min/L after a dose of 60 mg/m2 Leu-Dox (= 86 mumol/m2). After the same molar dose of Dox (50 mg/m2 = 86 mumol/m2), the AUC infinity of Dox was 179 mumol.min/L, indicating that Leu-Dox was converted into Dox for 23% in the plasma compartment. The AUCs infinity of Leu-Dox, Dox, and Dol increased linearly with the dose. Negligible AUCs were observed for the other four metabolites. The AUCs infinity of Leu-Dox and Dox at the MTD (517 and 145 mumol.min/L, respectively) were lower than those in mice at the LD10 (1,930 and 798 mumol.min/L, respectively), which means that the MTD could not be predicted from the preclinical pharmacokinetics in mice. Hematologic toxicity, especially the WBC count, appeared to correlate much better with the AUC of Dox (r = .91) than with the AUC of Leu-Dox (r = .74), thus confirming the prodrug character of Leu-Dox. CONCLUSIONS: Dox is rapidly formed from Leu-Dox, and seems causative in the observed myelotoxicity. The MTD could not be predicted from the AUC at the LD10 in mice.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
S. Bien, C. A. Ritter, M. Gratz, B. Sperker, J. Sonnemann, J. F. Beck, and H. K. Kroemer
Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B Mediates Up-Regulation of Cathepsin B by Doxorubicin in Tumor Cells
Mol. Pharmacol., May 1, 2004; 65(5): 1092 - 1102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
V. Dubois, L. Dasnois, K. Lebtahi, F. Collot, N. Heylen, N. Havaux, A.-M. Fernandez, T. J. Lobl, C. Oliyai, M. Nieder, et al.
CPI-0004Na, a New Extracellularly Tumor-Activated Prodrug of Doxorubicin: In Vivo Toxicity, Activity, and Tissue Distribution Confirm Tumor Cell Selectivity
Cancer Res., April 1, 2002; 62(8): 2327 - 2331.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
A. Trouet, A. Passioukov, K. Van derpoorten, A.-M. Fernandez, J. Abarca-Quinones, R. Baurain, T. J. Lobl, C. Oliyai, D. Shochat, and V. Dubois
Extracellularly Tumor-activated Prodrugs for the Selective Chemotherapy of Cancer: Application to Doxorubicin and Preliminary in Vitro and in Vivo Studies
Cancer Res., April 1, 2001; 61(7): 2843 - 2846.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 1992 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online