Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pyrhonen, S.
Right arrow Articles by Muhonen, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pyrhonen, S.
Right arrow Articles by Muhonen, T.

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 10, 1919-1926, Copyright © 1992 by American Society of Clinical Oncology


ARTICLES

A promising interferon plus four-drug chemotherapy regimen for metastatic melanoma

S Pyrhonen, M Hahka-Kemppinen and T Muhonen
Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to determine the therapeutic efficacy and toxicity of a four-drug chemotherapy regimen combined with natural leukocyte interferon alfa (IFN-alpha) for metastatic melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between December 1988 and December 1991, 48 consecutive unselected patients with metastatic melanoma were entered onto this phase II study. Forty-five of these patients were assessable for response and 46 for toxicity. The four-drug chemotherapy regimen was as follows: dacarbazine (DTIC) 200 mg/m2 days 1 to 5, vincristine 1 mg/m2 days 1 and 4, bleomycin 15 mg days 2 and 5 intravenously (IV), and lomustine (CCNU) 80 mg day 1 orally. IFN-alpha, initiated day 8, was administered 3 x 10(6) IU/d, subcutaneously (SC) for 6 weeks, followed by 6 x 10(6) IU three times per week. A small protocol modification was adopted from the 21st patient onwards whenever there was more than 2 months' stabilization or progression with the original protocol: IFN therapy was split into 2-week treatment periods interrupted by a 2-week rest period. RESULTS: Among the 45 assessable patients, the objective response rate was 62% (95% confidence limit, 48 to 77); six patients (13%) achieved a complete response (CR) and 22 (49%) a partial response (PR). Metastases in such sites as liver also responded favorably (one CR, six PR, one stable disease [SD], two progressive disease [PD]). After splitting IFN therapy for nonresponders, in two patients PD and in another two patients SD changed into regression. Three of the six patients with a CR have suffered a relapse, but the other three have been off treatment for 7, 18, and 31 months without recurrence. Most of the symptomatic patients also experienced rapid relief of symptoms. Overall toxicity of this mainly outpatient regimen seemed to be acceptable. One patient died of a septic fever with grade 4 leukopenia and thrombocytopenia. The most frequent side effects were transient fever, nausea/vomiting, fatigue, and grade I/II hematologic toxicity. CONCLUSION: Results demonstrate a remarkably high response rate in combining IFN-alpha and four chemotherapeutic agents. The apparent schedule-dependency of responses must be further explored in a controlled phase III study.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
A Schmittel, M Schmidt-Hieber, P Martus, N. Bechrakis, R Schuster, J. Siehl, M. Foerster, E Thiel, and U Keilholz
A randomized phase II trial of gemcitabine plus treosulfan versus treosulfan alone in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma
Ann. Onc., December 1, 2006; 17(12): 1826 - 1829.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
U. Bottoni, P. Bonaccorsi, V. Devirgiliis, V. Panasiti, R. G. Borroni, G. Trasimeni, R. Clerico, and S. Calvieri
Complete Remission of Brain Metastases in Three Patients with Stage IV Melanoma Treated with BOLD and G-CSF
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2005; 35(9): 507 - 513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
R. Kumar, S. Angelini, K. Czene, I. Sauroja, M. Hahka-Kemppinen, S. Pyrhonen, and K. Hemminki
BRAF Mutations in Metastatic Melanoma: A Possible Association with Clinical Outcome
Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2003; 9(9): 3362 - 3368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. R. Middleton, J. J. Grob, N. Aaronson, G. Fierlbeck, W. Tilgen, S. Seiter, M. Gore, S. Aamdal, J. Cebon, A. Coates, et al.
Randomized Phase III Study of Temozolomide Versus Dacarbazine in the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Metastatic Malignant Melanoma
J. Clin. Oncol., January 5, 2000; 18(1): 158 - 158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
S. Wadler and E. L. Schwartz
New Advances in Interferon Therapy of Cancer
Oncologist, August 1, 1997; 2(4): 254 - 267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 1992 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online