Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goffman, T.
Right arrow Articles by Glatstein, E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goffman, T.
Right arrow Articles by Glatstein, E

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 10, 264-268, Copyright © 1992 by American Society of Clinical Oncology


ARTICLES

Long-term follow-up on National Cancer Institute Phase I/II study of glioblastoma multiforme treated with iododeoxyuridine and hyperfractionated irradiation

TE Goffman, LJ Dachowski, H Bobo, EH Oldfield, SM Steinberg, J Cook, JB Mitchell, D Katz, R Smith and E Glatstein
Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892.

PURPOSE: We report the results of the final phase I/II program in glioblastoma (GBM) multiforme patients using only hyperfractionated irradiation and intravenous iododeoxyuridine (IdUrd). METHODS: For a decade we investigated halogenated pyrimidine radiosensitizers in an effort to exploit the potential for differential uptake of thymidine analogs between proliferating tumor and normal brain tissues. Trials began with bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) but were changed to IdUrd when the latter proved less photosensitizing. A series of dose-escalating pilot trials led to treatment at a maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of IdUrd of 1,000 mg/m2/d for two separate 14-day courses, one during the initial radiation field and one during the cone down. The radiotherapy also evolved over time and was hyperfractionated in all cases reported. Over 5 years we accrued 45 patients into the final hyperfractionated, 1,000 mg/m2/d scheme. We report here results on only the patients with minimum follow-up of 1 year (90% had at least 2 years of follow-up) or until death. RESULTS: The results do not indicate a significant benefit for use of sensitizers, as compared with other contemporary and aggressive types of radiation treatment. The median survival has been 11 months, with a 2-year actuarial survival of 9%. As yet, there are no survivors at 3 years. Tumor biopsies at craniotomy showed relatively low sensitizer incorporation. CONCLUSION: The failure of radiosensitizers combined with radiation therapy to show major benefit may be due to patient selection but appears also to be related to the combined problems of poor drug penetration/uptake into tumor, tumor- cell heterogeneity, and a high inherent cellular radioresistance of GBM.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
U. Roelcke, O. Hausmann, A. Merlo, J. Missimer, R. P. Maguire, P. Freitag, E. W. Radu, R. Weinreich, O. Gratzl, and K. L. Leenders
PET Imaging Drug Distribution After Intratumoral Injection: The Case for 124I-Iododeoxyuridine in Malignant Gliomas
J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2002; 43(11): 1444 - 1451.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 1992 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online