Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 10, 330-333, Copyright © 1992 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
Telephone counseling improves adherence to colposcopy among lower- income minority women
C Lerman, P Hanjani, C Caputo, S Miller, E Delmoor, S Nolte and P Engstrom
Division of Population Science, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA.
PURPOSE: A randomized trial was conducted to evaluate the impact of a
telephone counseling intervention to improve patient adherence to
colposcopic examination for suspected cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
(CIN). METHODS: Subjects were lower-income, minority women who missed a
scheduled initial appointment for colposcopy at an urban medical clinic.
Patients were randomly assigned to either a control condition (n = 42) or a
telephone counseling condition (n = 48). The 15- minute, structured
telephone counseling intervention protocol addressed educational,
psychosocial, and practical barriers to colposcopy adherence. RESULTS: The
most common patient-reported barriers to colposcopy adherence included a
lack of understanding of the purpose of colposcopy (50%), worry about or
fear of cancer (25%), and forgetting (23%). Telephone counseling was found
to be highly effective in addressing these barriers and improving adherence
to diagnostic follow- up and treatment. Of patients in the control
condition, 43% complied with a rescheduled colposcopy appointment, compared
with 67% in the telephone counseling condition. Logistic regression
analysis indicated that the effect of telephone counseling was independent
of sociodemographic confounder variables (odds ratio = 2.6; P less than
.003). Additionally, 74% of patients who received the initial telephone
counseling adhered to recommended treatment, compared with 53% of patients
in the control condition. CONCLUSION: Brief, structured telephone contact
may be a cost-effective mechanism for improving adherence to diagnostic
follow-up and treatment for a variety of cancer screening tests.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. E. Ford, V. Randolph, L. Hopkins-Johnson, S. L. Eason, S. Havstad, M. Jankowski, G. M. Swanson, C. C. Johnson, and S. W. Vernon
Design of a Case Management Approach to Enhance Cancer Screening Trial Retention Among Older African American Men
J Aging Health,
November 1, 2004;
16(5_suppl):
39S - 57S.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. S. Benjes, D. R. Brooks, Z. Zhang, L. Livstone, L. Sayers, C. Powers, D. R. Miller, T. Heeren, and A. C. Geller
Changing Patterns of Sun Protection Between the First and Second Summers for Very Young Children
Arch Dermatol,
August 1, 2004;
140(8):
925 - 930.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. R. Yabroff, N. Breen, S. W. Vernon, H. I. Meissner, A. N. Freedman, and R. Ballard-Barbash
What Factors Are Associated with Diagnostic Follow-Up after Abnormal Mammograms? Findings from a U.S. National Survey
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.,
May 1, 2004;
13(5):
723 - 732.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Karasz, M. D. McKee, and K. Roybal
Women's Experiences of Abnormal Cervical Cytology: Illness Representations, Care Processes, and Outcomes
Ann. Fam. Med,
November 1, 2003;
1(4):
196 - 202.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. P. Engelstad, S. L. Stewart, B. H. Nguyen, K. L. Bedeian, M. M. Rubin, R. J. Pasick, and R. A. Hiatt
Abnormal Pap Smear Follow-Up in a High-Risk Population
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.,
October 1, 2001;
10(10):
1015 - 1020.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A. Kahn, E. Goodman, G. B. Slap, B. Huang, and S. J. Emans
Intention to Return for Papanicolaou Smears in Adolescent Girls and Young Women
Pediatrics,
August 1, 2001;
108(2):
333 - 341.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. S. Duke, S. A. McGraw, and N. E. Avis
Exposure to Diethylstilbestrol: Design of a Multilevel Community Intervention
Health Promot Pract,
April 1, 2000;
1(2):
188 - 195.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Brain, J. Gray, P. Norman, E. Parsons, A. Clarke, C. Rogers, R. Mansel, and P. Harper
Why do women attend familial breast cancer clinics?
J. Med. Genet.,
March 1, 2000;
37(3):
197 - 202.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A. Kahn, V. Chiou, J. D. Allen, E. Goodman, S. E. Perlman, and S. J. Emans
Beliefs About Papanicolaou Smears and Compliance With Papanicolaou Smear Follow-up in Adolescents
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med,
October 1, 1999;
153(10):
1046 - 1054.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. D. McKee, J. Lurio, P. Marantz, W. Burton, and M. Mulvihill
Barriers to Follow-up of Abnormal Papanicolaou Smears in an Urban Community Health Center
Arch Fam Med,
March 1, 1999;
8(2):
129 - 134.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Brain, P. Norman, J. Gray, and R. Mansel
Anxiety and Adherence to Breast Self-Examination in Women With a Family History of Breast Cancer
Psychosom Med,
March 1, 1999;
61(2):
181 - 187.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|