Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lerner, A.
Right arrow Articles by Mayer, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lerner, A.
Right arrow Articles by Mayer, R. J.

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 10, 536-540, Copyright © 1992 by American Society of Clinical Oncology


ARTICLES

Etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin chemotherapy for advanced gastric adenocarcinoma: results of a phase II trial

A Lerner, R Gonin, GD Steele Jr and RJ Mayer
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115.

PURPOSE: A phase II study of etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (EAP) therapy in patients with advanced gastric carcinoma was performed in an attempt to confirm encouraging results reported by German investigators using an identical EAP regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-six consecutive, previously untreated patients with surgically unresectable, measurable gastric carcinoma were treated every 28 days with etoposide (120 mg/m2, days 4, 5, and 6), doxorubicin (20 mg/m2, days 1 and 7), and cisplatin (40 mg/m2, days 2 and 8). A total of 108 courses of treatment was given. RESULTS: Therapy was associated with myelosuppression (median granulocyte nadir, 239/microL; median platelet nadir, 81,000/microL), which reached its maximum 14 days after the start of therapy and necessitated hospitalization after 24 of 108 (22%) treatment courses. Four of 36 (11%) patients died of treatment-related toxicity: three from sepsis and one from hemorrhage. Objective responses were observed in 12 of 36 (33%) patients; three (8%) patients experienced a clinical complete response. The median time to progression was 4 months for all 36 patients and 8 months for the 12 responding patients. Of the 13 patients with localized but unresectable disease, five subsequently underwent surgical resection; only one of these five was rendered disease-free. CONCLUSION: The EAP regimen is highly toxic and results in response rates and survival times no better than those of more easily tolerated treatment programs.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
S. S. Wohrer, M. Raderer, and M. Hejna
Palliative chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer
Ann. Onc., November 1, 2004; 15(11): 1585 - 1595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. H. Kulke
The Treatment of Advanced Gastric Cancer: In Search of the Right Combination
J. Clin. Oncol., July 14, 2000; 18(14): 2645 - 2647.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
C. S. Fuchs and R. J. Mayer
Gastric Carcinoma
N. Engl. J. Med., July 6, 1995; 333(1): 32 - 41.
[Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 1992 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online