Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Erratum (v10,p1655)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eddy, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eddy, D. M.

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 10, 657-670, Copyright © 1992 by American Society of Clinical Oncology


ARTICLES

High-dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow transplantation for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer [published erratum appears in J Clin Oncol 1992 Oct;10(10):1655-8]

DM Eddy
Center for Health Policy, Research, and Education, Duke University, Durham, NC.

PURPOSE: This review was undertaken to examine the evidence of effectiveness of high-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation (HDC/ABMT) for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer and to compare the magnitudes of the benefits and harms of HDC/ABMT with those of conventional doses of chemotherapy. DESIGN: Published studies were reviewed and analyzed. RESULTS: No randomized controlled trials have been published that evaluate HDC/ABMT. Only one internally controlled study has been conducted; it demonstrated that HDC/ABMT and conventional treatment have virtually identical outcomes. Comparisons of uncontrolled clinical series are confounded by patient selection and other biases. Gross comparisons indicate that, compared with conventional-dose chemotherapy, HDC/ABMT achieves (1) higher complete response rates (36% v 8%), (2) higher overall response rates (70% v 39%), (3) similar median response durations (8 months v 9.6 months), (4) similar median survival durations (16 months v 16.6 months), and (5) similar overall survival rates (eg, 43% 2-year survival v 39%). Observations of cases with longer-term disease-free survival are promising but not conclusive. High-dose chemotherapy with ABMT has a higher treatment-related mortality rate (5% to 15% v 1%), a high rate of nonmortal toxicity (approximately 30%), and a high rate of side effects (approaching 100%). CONCLUSIONS: Firm conclusions are not possible because of the lack of controlled studies and the presence of numerous biases. However, the existing evidence does not demonstrate that HDC/ABMT is superior to conventional-dose chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Randomized controlled trials are needed.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
A. R. Zander, C. Schmoor, N. Kroger, W. Kruger, V. Mobus, N. Frickhofen, B. Metzner, W. E. Berdel, M. Koenigsmann, E. Thiel, et al.
Randomized trial of high-dose adjuvant chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic stem-cell support versus standard-dose chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with 10 or more positive lymph nodes: overall survival after 6 years of follow-up
Ann. Onc., June 1, 2008; 19(6): 1082 - 1089.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
P. D. Jacobson, R. A. Rettig, and W. M. Aubry
Litigating the Science of Breast Cancer Treatment
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, October 1, 2007; 32(5): 785 - 818.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
A.R. Zander, N. Kroger, C. Schmoor, W. Kruger, V. Mobus, N. Frickhofen, B. Metzner, W. Schultze, W.E. Berdel, M. Koenigsmann, et al.
High-Dose Chemotherapy With Autologous Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Support Compared With Standard-Dose Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients With 10 or More Positive Lymph Nodes: First Results of a Randomized Trial
J. Clin. Oncol., June 15, 2004; 22(12): 2273 - 2283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PsychosomaticsHome page
M. Gurevich, G. M. Devins, and G. M. Rodin
Stress Response Syndromes and Cancer: Conceptual and Assessment Issues
Psychosomatics, August 1, 2002; 43(4): 259 - 281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
H G. Welch and J. Mogielnicki
Presumed benefit: lessons from the American experience with marrow transplantation for breast cancer
BMJ, May 4, 2002; 324(7345): 1088 - 1092.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
M. M. Mello and T. A. Brennan
The Controversy Over High-Dose Chemotherapy With Autologous Bone Marrow Transplant For Breast Cancer
Health Aff., September 1, 2001; 20(5): 101 - 117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
W. P. Peters, R. D. Dansey, J. L. Klein, and R. D. Baynes
High-Dose Chemotherapy and Peripheral Blood Progenitor Cell Transplantation in the Treatment of Breast Cancer
Oncologist, February 1, 2000; 5(1): 1 - 13.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JCOHome page
D. L. Carter, L. B. Marks, J. M. Bean, G. Broadwater, A. Hussein, J. J. Vredenburgh, W. P. Peters, and L. R. Prosnitz
Impact of Consolidation Radiotherapy in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer Treated With High-Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Bone Marrow Rescue
J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 1999; 17(3): 887 - 887.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
C. L. Vogel and J.-M. Nabholtz
Monotherapy of Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Review of Newer Agents
Oncologist, February 1, 1999; 4(1): 17 - 33.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JCOHome page
L. R. Acuna, M. Langhi, J. Perez, J. R. Acuna, M. Machiavelli, J. Lacava, C. Vallejo, A. Romero, H. Fasce, E. Ortiz, et al.
Vinorelbine and Paclitaxel as First-Line Chemotherapy in Metastatic Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 1999; 17(1): 74 - 74.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
G. N. Hortobagyi
Treatment of Breast Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med., October 1, 1998; 339(14): 974 - 984.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
J.-P. Droz, S. Culine, P. Biron, and A. Kramar
High-Dose Chemotherapy in Adult Solid Tumors and Lymphoproliferative Disorders: The Need for Randomized Trials
Oncologist, April 1, 1997; 2(2): 83 - 93.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
B. Brockstein and S. Williams
High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue for breast cancer: yesterday, today and tomorrow
Stem Cells, January 1, 1996; 14(1): 79 - 89.
[Abstract]


Home page
NEJMHome page
K. J. Krause, C. M. Cutler, I. S. Udvarhelyi, W. Winkenwerder, J. K. Erban, K. M. Templeton, J. R. Wingard, V. Khanna, W. P. Peters, and M. C. Rogers
Variations in Insurance Coverage for Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation for Breast Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med., August 4, 1994; 331(5): 329 - 331.
[Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
H. B. Muss, A. D. Thor, D. A. Berry, T. Kute, E. T. Liu, F. Koerner, C. T. Cirrincione, D. R. Budman, W. C. Wood, M. Barcos, et al.
c-erbB-2 Expression and Response to Adjuvant Therapy in Women with Node-Positive Early Breast Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med., May 5, 1994; 330(18): 1260 - 1266.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
S. D. Boren
I Had a Tough Day Today, Hillary
N. Engl. J. Med., February 17, 1994; 330(7): 500 - 502.
[Full Text]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
J. R. Beck
Making Medical Decision Making More User-friendly
Med Decis Making, February 1, 1993; 13(1): 1 - 2.
[PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 1992 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online