Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 10, 804-809, Copyright © 1992 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
Phase I trial of high-dose bolus interleukin-2 and interferon alfa-2a in patients with metastatic malignancy
GT Budd, S Murthy, J Finke, J Sergi, V Gibson, S Medendorp, B Barna, J Boyett and RM Bukowski
Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH 44195.
PURPOSE: Based on preclinical evidence that the antitumor effects of the
combination of interleukin-2 (IL-2) and interferon alfa (IFN alpha) are
greater than those of either cytokine alone, we have performed a phase I
trial of recombinant IL-2 (rIL-2) and recombinant human IFN alpha 2a
(rHuIFN alpha 2a) in patients with refractory malignancies. This study was
an extension of an earlier trial that identified reversible
myelosuppression as the dose-limiting toxicity of this combination. The
present trial used modified definitions of unacceptable toxicity to allow
exploration of higher doses of rIL-2. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Both rHuIFN
alpha 2a 10.0 x 10(6) U/m2 intramuscularly (IM) and rIL-2 were administered
three times weekly for 4 consecutive weeks. IL-2 was given by intravenous
(IV) bolus injection at doses that were escalated in successive cohorts of
four to six patients, provided that toxicity at the preceding dose level
was acceptable. Unacceptable toxicity was defined as an elevation of the
serum creatinine level to greater than 5 mg/dL, an elevation of the serum
bilirubin level to greater than 5 mg/dL, dyspnea at rest, hypotension
refractory to pressors, altered mental status, or other toxicities of grade
3 to 4, using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria.
The doses of rIL-2 administered were 4.0 x 10(6), 6.0 x 10(6), 8.0 x 10(6),
10.0 x 10(6), 12.0 x 10(6), 14.0 x 10(6), 18.0 x 10(6), 22.0 x 10(6), and
26.0 x 10(6) BRMP (Hoffman- LaRoche) U/m2. At a dose of rIL-2 10.0 x 10(6)
BRMP U/m2, patients were also treated with doses of rHuIFN alpha 2a of 1.0
x 10(6) and 0.1 x 10(6) U/m2. RESULTS: A total of 57 patients were treated.
Intolerable side effects (hypotension, pulmonary, and CNS toxicity) were
produced by rIL-2 26.0 x 10(6) BRMP U/m2 and rHuIFN alpha 2a 10.0 x 10(6)
U/m2. Two of 21 patients with renal cell carcinoma showed objective
responses, and five of 17 patients with malignant melanoma responded. Two
of these responses in melanoma were complete and continue to be
longlasting. CONCLUSIONS: When given with rHuIFN alpha 2a 10.0 x 10(6) U/m2
as described above, the maximum-tolerated dose of rIL-2 is 22.0 x 10(6)
BRMP U/m2. This dose of rIL-2 is equivalent to 50 to 60 MIU/m2, depending
on the conversion factor used. Based on this experience and other trials,
we favor phase II trials in renal cell carcinoma using an alternative dose
schedule of this cytokine combination, in which rIL-2 is administered by
continuous infusion. We suggest that phase II trials of this combination in
patients with melanoma use an rIL-2 dose of 8.0 x 10(6) BRMP U/m2 by IV
bolus injection three times weekly in combination with rHuIFN alpha 2a 10.0
x 10(6) U/m2 IM three times weekly.