Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 11, 1858-1865, Copyright © 1993 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
Multiple-drug weekly chemotherapy versus standard combination regimen in small-cell lung cancer: a phase III randomized study conducted by the European Lung Cancer Working Party
JP Sculier, M Paesmans, G Bureau, G Dabouis, P Libert, G Vandermoten, O Van Cutsem, MC Berchier, F Ries and J Michel
Department of Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet, Bruxelles, Belgium.
PURPOSE: A randomized trial was conducted in patients with small-cell lung
cancer (SCLC) to determine if survival can be improved by a weekly
chemotherapy regimen combining various drugs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two
hundred twenty-three patients were randomized to receive either six courses
of a multiple-drug combination (MDC) regimen (Adriamycin [ADR; doxorubicin;
Farmitalia Carlo Erba, Milan, Italy] 25 mg/m2 intravenously [i.v.] on day
1; etoposide [VP16] 120 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1; cyclophosphamide [CPA] 500
mg/m2 i.v. on day 1; cisplatin 60 mg/m2 i.v. on day 8; vindesine [VDS] 3
mg/m2 i.v. on day 8; vincristine [VCR] 2 mg i.v. on day 15; methotrexate
[MTX] 100 mg/m2 i.v. on day 15), or a standard chemotherapy (SC) regimen
(ADR 50 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1; CPA 1 g/m2 i.v. on day 1; VP16 80 mg/m2 i.v.
on days 1 to 3). RESULTS: In 98 MDC-treated and 101 SC-treated assessable
patients, we observed 69% and 62% objective responses rates, respectively.
There was no significant difference in survival, with median durations and
2-year overall survival rates of 49 and 43 weeks and 8.5% and 7.9%,
respectively. There was a significant increase in response rate in favor of
MDC patients with limited disease (84% v 62%). Toxicity was tolerable,
although SC was more hematotoxic, with 76% (v 59%) experiencing leukopenia
and 17% (v 7%) experiencing thrombocytopenia (grades III and IV). If the
cumulative doses received were nearly equal to the scheduled cumulative
doses in both arms, the total relative dose- intensity (RDI) was
significantly higher in the SC arm. The difference was due to increased
treatment delays in the MDC arm. CONCLUSION: Weekly MDC failed to improve
survival rates in patients with SCLC.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. P. Sculier, J. J. Lafitte, A. Efremidis, M. C. Florin, J. Lecomte, M. C. Berchier, M. Richez, T. Berghmans, A. Scherpereel, A. P. Meert, et al.
A phase III randomised study of concomitant induction radiochemotherapy testing two modalities of radiosensitisation by cisplatin (standard versus daily) for limited small-cell lung cancer
Ann. Onc.,
October 1, 2008;
19(10):
1691 - 1697.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Crivellari, S. Monfardini, S. Stragliotto, D. Marino, and S. M. L. Aversa
Increasing Chemotherapy in Small-Cell Lung Cancer: From Dose Intensity and Density to Megadoses
Oncologist,
January 1, 2007;
12(1):
79 - 89.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. G. Spiro and J. C. Porter
Lung Cancer--Where Are We Today?: Current Advances in Staging and Nonsurgical Treatment
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.,
November 1, 2002;
166(9):
1166 - 1196.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. P. Sculier, J. J. Lafitte, J. Lecomte, T. Berghmans, J. Thiriaux, O. Van Cutsem, A. Efremidis, V. Ninane, M. Paesmans, P. Mommen, et al.
A phase II randomised trial comparing the cisplatin-etoposide combination chemotherapy with or without carboplatin as second-line therapy for small-cell lung cancer
Ann. Onc.,
September 1, 2002;
13(9):
1454 - 1459.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. H. Johnson
Management of Small Cell Lung Cancer* : Current State of the Art
Chest,
December 1, 1999;
116(suppl_3):
525S - 530S.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Elias
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Small Cell Lung Cancer*
Chest,
December 1, 1999;
116(suppl_3):
531S - 538S.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. H. Johnson and D. P. Carbone
Increased Dose-Intensity in Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Failed Strategy?
J. Clin. Oncol.,
August 1, 1999;
17(8):
2297 - 2297.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Murray, R. B. Livingston, F. A. Shepherd, K. James, B. Zee, A. Langleben, M. Kraut, J. Bearden, J. W. Goodwin, C. Grafton, et al.
Randomized Study of CODE Versus Alternating CAV/EP for Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: An Intergroup Study of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group and the Southwest Oncology Group
J. Clin. Oncol.,
August 1, 1999;
17(8):
2300 - 2300.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|