Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Danhauser, L. L.
Right arrow Articles by Markowitz, A. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Danhauser, L. L.
Right arrow Articles by Markowitz, A. B.

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 11, 751-761, Copyright © 1993 by American Society of Clinical Oncology


ARTICLES

Phase I and plasma pharmacokinetic study of infusional fluorouracil combined with recombinant interferon alfa-2b in patients with advanced cancer

LL Danhauser, JH Freimann Jr, TL Gilchrist, JU Gutterman, CY Hunter, AC Yeomans and AB Markowitz
Department of Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston 77030.

PURPOSE: Enhanced fluorouracil (FUra) cytotoxicity caused by recombinant interferon alfa-2b (rIFN-a) has been reported, but the mechanism, optimal dose, and schedule remain unknown. Therefore, a phase I and pharmacokinetic study of FUra with escalating doses of rIFN- a was initiated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: FUra (750 mg/m2/d) was given by continuous intravenous (IV) infusion for 5 days. rIFN-a (0.1 to 15 x 10(6) U/m2/d) was given subcutaneously (SC) daily for 5 days concurrent with FUra. Courses were repeated every 14 to 21 days. Forty-four patients were enrolled; 39 received at least two courses. During the first course of therapy, FUra levels before and after administration of rIFN-a were quantitated in 26 patients by high-pressure liquid chromatography. RESULTS: The maximum-tolerated dose of rIFN-a was 10 x 10(6) U/m2/d. Stomatitis was dose-limiting. Three partial and five minor responses occurred. Interpatient pharmacokinetics showed that rIFN-a did not alter steady-state plasma concentration (Css; range, 0.77 +/- 0.35 mumol/L to 1.85 +/- 0.48 mumol/L), elimination half-life (t1/2; mean, 9.7 +/- 4.3 minutes), area under the concentration-versus- time curve (AUC; range, 93 to 224 mumol/L x hours), total-body clearance (CI; range, 1,172 to 3,236 mL/min), or volume of distribution (range, 11.9 to 49.2 L) of FUra. Intrapatient data evaluation revealed a dose-independent effect of rIFN-a. The mean FUra Css after rIFN-a administration (1.31 mumol/L) was greater than that before rIFN-a administration (1.02 mumol/L, P < .0001). FUra Cl after rIFN-a administration was reduced by 20% to 35% compared with use of FUra alone (P < .0001). Patients with a greater than 20% decrease in FUra Cl had a fourfold greater incidence of diarrhea. CONCLUSION: rIFN-a reduces FUra Cl and, consequently, increases FUra-associated toxicity. Phase II studies of FUra and rIFN-a seem to be warranted.




About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 1993 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online