Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 14, 671-679, Copyright © 1996 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
Outcomes of cancer treatment for technology assessment and cancer treatment guidelines. American Society of Clinical Oncology
In 1993, the Health Services Research Committee of the American Society of
Clinical Oncology (ASCO) charged an Outcomes Working Group with defining
the outcomes of adult and pediatric cancer treatment to be used for
technology assessment and development of cancer treatment guidelines. The
Working Group defined by consensus outcomes for technology assessment and
guideline development, focusing on cancer treatments. The Working Group
considered a variety of perspectives on outcomes, including those of
patients, physicians, clinical investigators, ASCO, and policy makers.
Because ASCO's guidelines will define what constitutes the best treatment
and not whether that treatment should be paid for, the Working Group gave
higher priority to the clinical and clinical research perspectives than to
the health policy perspective. Survival is the most important outcome of
cancer treatment. An improvement in at least disease-free survival is a
prerequisite for recommending adjuvant therapy. In the case of metastatic
cancer, treatment can be recommended even without an improvement in
survival, if it improves quality of life. Quality of life includes global
quality of life, as well as its physical, psychologic, and social
dimensions. To be an outcome of cancer treatment, quality-of-life measures
must be sensitive to clinically meaningful changes produced by treatment;
evaluations must control for placebo effects and determinants of quality of
life not related to cancer or its treatment. Toxicity, both short and long
term, is vitally important, with the latter being particularly critical in
children. The value of cancer outcomes like tumor response (eg, complete or
partial response) and biomarkers (eg, CA-125) for technology assessment and
guideline development depends on their ability to predict patient outcomes
(survival and quality of life) or to influence decisions about treatment.
Complete response is an important outcome when it predicts survival.
Progression is important because it signals the need to change or stop
treatment. Cost-effectiveness is an especially important outcome to
consider when the benefits of treatment are modest or the costs are high.
Patient outcomes (eg, survival and quality of life) should receive higher
priority than cancer outcomes (eg, response rate), but both types of
outcomes are important in technology assessment and guideline development.
Multiple outcomes should be considered because no single outcome adequately
describes the results of cancer treatment. In general, there is no minimum
benefit above which treatments are justified; rather, benefits should be
balanced against toxicity and cost.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. E. Harrington and T. J. Smith
The Role of Chemotherapy at the End of Life: "When Is Enough, Enough?"
JAMA,
June 11, 2008;
299(22):
2667 - 2678.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Khatcheressian, A. C. Wolff, T. J. Smith, E. Grunfeld, H. B. Muss, V. G. Vogel, F. Halberg, M. R. Somerfield, and N. E. Davidson
American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006 Update of the Breast Cancer Follow-Up and Management Guidelines in the Adjuvant Setting
J. Clin. Oncol.,
November 1, 2006;
24(31):
5091 - 5097.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. T. Budd, M. Cristofanilli, M. J. Ellis, A. Stopeck, E. Borden, M. C. Miller, J. Matera, M. Repollet, G. V. Doyle, L. W.M.M. Terstappen, et al.
Circulating Tumor Cells versus Imaging--Predicting Overall Survival in Metastatic Breast Cancer.
Clin. Cancer Res.,
November 1, 2006;
12(21):
6403 - 6409.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Matsuyama, S. Reddy, and T. J. Smith
Why Do Patients Choose Chemotherapy Near the End of Life? A Review of the Perspective of Those Facing Death From Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
July 20, 2006;
24(21):
3490 - 3496.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. J. Smith, J. Khatcheressian, G. H. Lyman, H. Ozer, J. O. Armitage, L. Balducci, C. L. Bennett, S. B. Cantor, J. Crawford, S. J. Cross, et al.
2006 Update of Recommendations for the Use of White Blood Cell Growth Factors: An Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline
J. Clin. Oncol.,
July 1, 2006;
24(19):
3187 - 3205.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. N. L. Avery, C. Metcalfe, J. Nicklin, C. P. Barham, D. Alderson, J. L. Donovan, and J. M. Blazeby
Satisfaction With Care: An Independent Outcome Measure in Surgical Oncology
Ann. Surg. Oncol.,
June 1, 2006;
13(6):
817 - 822.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Tassinari, B. Poggi, M. Fantini, E. Tamburini, S. Nicoletti, and S. Sartori
Cost-opportunity analysis in clinical oncology: from the 'wild far-west' to a correct integration of the disciplines, avoiding the 'war of the worlds'
Ann. Onc.,
May 1, 2006;
17(5):
876 - 877.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Tassinari, B. Poggi, E. Tamburini, M. Fantini, S. Nicoletti, and S. Sartori
Quality of care in clinical oncology: from the dreamworld to the real world of outcome assessment
Ann. Onc.,
January 1, 2006;
17(1):
177 - 178.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Ezzo, A. Vickers, M. A. Richardson, C. Allen, S. L. Dibble, B. Issell, L. Lao, M. Pearl, G. Ramirez, J. A. Roscoe, et al.
Acupuncture-Point Stimulation for Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting
J. Clin. Oncol.,
October 1, 2005;
23(28):
7188 - 7198.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A. Meyerhardt, J. A. Sloan, D. J. Sargent, R. M. Goldberg, M. Pollak, R. F. Morton, R. K. Ramanathan, S. K. Williamson, B. P. Findlay, and C. S. Fuchs
Associations between Plasma Insulin-Like Growth Factor Proteins and C-Peptide and Quality of Life in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.,
June 1, 2005;
14(6):
1402 - 1410.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M.-F. Demierre, A. Tien, and D. Miller
Health-Related Quality-of-Life Assessment in Patients With Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma
Arch Dermatol,
March 1, 2005;
141(3):
325 - 330.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. R. Buchanan, A. M. O'Mara, J. W. Kelaghan, and L. M. Minasian
Quality-of-Life Assessment in the Symptom Management Trials of the National Cancer Institute-Supported Community Clinical Oncology Program
J. Clin. Oncol.,
January 20, 2005;
23(3):
591 - 598.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. T. Truong, I. A. Olivotto, T. J. Whelan, and M. Levine
Outcomes of postmastectomy radiotherapy
Can. Med. Assoc. J.,
January 4, 2005;
172(1):
19 - 19.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Kalant
Outcomes of postmastectomy radiotherapy
Can. Med. Assoc. J.,
January 4, 2005;
172(1):
18 - 18.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Landier, S. Bhatia, D. A. Eshelman, K. J. Forte, T. Sweeney, A. L. Hester, J. Darling, F. D. Armstrong, J. Blatt, L. S. Constine, et al.
Development of Risk-Based Guidelines for Pediatric Cancer Survivors: The Children's Oncology Group Long-Term Follow-Up Guidelines From the Children's Oncology Group Late Effects Committee and Nursing Discipline
J. Clin. Oncol.,
December 15, 2004;
22(24):
4979 - 4990.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Chau, A. R. Norman, D. Cunningham, J. S. Waters, J. Oates, and P. J. Ross
Multivariate Prognostic Factor Analysis in Locally Advanced and Metastatic Esophago-Gastric Cancer--Pooled Analysis From Three Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trials Using Individual Patient Data
J. Clin. Oncol.,
June 15, 2004;
22(12):
2395 - 2403.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Toth-Fejel, P. Muller, B. Ham, K. Esvelt, N. Dumas, K. Calhoun, and R. Pommier
DNA Fingerprints Provide a Patient-Specific Breast Cancer Marker
Ann. Surg. Oncol.,
June 1, 2004;
11(6):
560 - 567.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.S. Burgers, B. Fervers, M. Haugh, M. Brouwers, G. Browman, T. Philip, and F.A. Cluzeau
International Assessment of the Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology Using the Appraisal of Guidelines and Research and Evaluation Instrument
J. Clin. Oncol.,
May 15, 2004;
22(10):
2000 - 2007.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. T. Chung and R. W. Carlson
Goals and Objectives in the Management of Metastatic Breast Cancer
Oncologist,
December 1, 2003;
8(6):
514 - 520.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Harper, T. Plunkett, and D. Khayat
Quality Trials and Quality of Life in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
August 15, 2003;
21(16):
3007 - 3008.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Tassinari, I. Panzini, S. Sartori, and A. Ravaioli
Surrogate Outcomes in Quality-of-Life Research: Where Will We End Up?
J. Clin. Oncol.,
May 1, 2003;
21(9):
1894 - 1895.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A. Sloan
Quality-of-Life Meta-Analysis: Why Treat It Differently?
J. Clin. Oncol.,
April 1, 2003;
21(7):
1422 - 1422.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. D. Rizzo, A. E. Lichtin, S. H. Woolf, J. Seidenfeld, C. L. Bennett, D. Cella, B. Djulbegovic, M. J. Goode, A. A. Jakubowski, S. J. Lee, et al.
Use of Epoetin in Patients With Cancer: Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the American Society of Hematology
J. Clin. Oncol.,
October 1, 2002;
20(19):
4083 - 4107.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. A. Santana-Blank, E. Rodriguez-Santana, F. Vargas, H. Reyes, P. Fernandez-Andrade, S. Rukos, and K. E. Santana-Rodriguez
Phase I Trial of an Infrared Pulsed Laser Device in Patients with Advanced Neoplasias
Clin. Cancer Res.,
October 1, 2002;
8(10):
3082 - 3091.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. D. Rizzo, A. E. Lichtin, S. H. Woolf, J. Seidenfeld, C. L. Bennett, D. Cella, B. Djulbegovic, M. J. Goode, A. A. Jakubowski, S. J. Lee, et al.
Use of epoetin in patients with cancer: evidence-based clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the American Society of Hematology
Blood,
September 18, 2002;
100(7):
2303 - 2320.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. P. Winer, C. Hudis, H. J. Burstein, R. T. Chlebowski, J. N. Ingle, S. B. Edge, E. P. Mamounas, J. Gralow, L. J. Goldstein, K. I. Pritchard, et al.
American Society of Clinical Oncology Technology Assessment on the Use of Aromatase Inhibitors as Adjuvant Therapy for Women With Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: Status Report 2002
J. Clin. Oncol.,
August 1, 2002;
20(15):
3317 - 3327.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. N. Levine and P. A. Ganz
Beyond the Development of Quality-of-Life Instruments: Where Do We Go From Here?
J. Clin. Oncol.,
May 1, 2002;
20(9):
2215 - 2216.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Heffernan, D. Cella, K. Webster, L. Odom, M. Martone, S. Passik, M. Bookbinder, Y. Fong, W. Jarnagin, and L. Blumgart
Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Hepatobiliary Cancers: The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobiliary Questionnaire
J. Clin. Oncol.,
May 1, 2002;
20(9):
2229 - 2239.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Cardoso, A. Di Leo, C. Lohrisch, C. Bernard, F. Ferreira, and M. J. Piccart
Second and subsequent lines of chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: what did we learn in the last two decades?
Ann. Onc.,
February 20, 2002;
13(2):
197 - 207.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Koller and W. Lorenz
Quality of life: a deconstruction for clinicians
J R Soc Med,
January 10, 2002;
95(10):
481 - 488.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. J. Smith and B. E. Hillner
Ensuring Quality Cancer Care by the Use of Clinical Practice Guidelines and Critical Pathways
J. Clin. Oncol.,
June 1, 2001;
19(11):
2886 - 2897.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Recchia, S. De Filippis, M. Rosselli, G. Saggio, A. Cesta, L. Fumagalli, and S. Rea
Phase 1B Study of Subcutaneously Administered Interleukin 2 in Combination with 13-cis Retinoic Acid as Maintenance Therapy in Advanced Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res.,
May 1, 2001;
7(5):
1251 - 1257.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. C. Bast Jr, P. Ravdin, D. F. Hayes, S. Bates, H. Fritsche Jr, J. M. Jessup, N. Kemeny, G. Y. Locker, R. G. Mennel, and M. R. Somerfield
2000 Update of Recommendations for the Use of Tumor Markers in Breast and Colorectal Cancer: Clinical Practice Guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
J. Clin. Oncol.,
March 15, 2001;
19(6):
1865 - 1878.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. B. Detmar, M. J. Muller, L. D. V. Wever, J. H. Schornagel, and N. K. Aaronson
Patient-Physician Communication During Outpatient Palliative Treatment Visits: An Observational Study
JAMA,
March 14, 2001;
285(10):
1351 - 1357.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Recht, S. B. Edge, L. J. Solin, D. S. Robinson, A. Estabrook, R. E. Fine, G. F. Fleming, S. Formenti, C. Hudis, J. J. Kirshner, et al.
Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: Clinical Practice Guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
J. Clin. Oncol.,
March 1, 2001;
19(5):
1539 - 1569.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. J. Smith
Tell It Like It Is
J. Clin. Oncol.,
October 19, 2000;
18(19):
3441 - 3445.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. B. Detmar, N. K. Aaronson, L. D. V. Wever, M. Muller, and J. H. Schornagel
How Are You Feeling? Who Wants To Know? Patients' and Oncologists' Preferences for Discussing Health-Related Quality-of-Life Issues
J. Clin. Oncol.,
September 15, 2000;
18(18):
3295 - 3301.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Norris, K. I. Pritchard, K. James, J. Myles, K. Bennett, S. Marlin, J. Skillings, B. Findlay, T. Vandenberg, P. Goss, et al.
Phase III Comparative Study of Vinorelbine Combined With Doxorubicin Versus Doxorubicin Alone in Disseminated Metastatic/Recurrent Breast Cancer: National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study MA8
J. Clin. Oncol.,
June 12, 2000;
18(12):
2385 - 2394.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Waldron, C. A. O'Boyle, M. Kearney, M. Moriarty, and D. Carney
Quality-of-Life Measurement in Advanced Cancer: Assessing the Individual
J. Clin. Oncol.,
November 1, 1999;
17(11):
3603 - 3611.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. L. Hensley, L. M. Schuchter, C. Lindley, N. J. Meropol, G. I. Cohen, G. Broder, W. J. Gradishar, D. M. Green, R. J. Langdon Jr, R. B. Mitchell, et al.
American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Use of Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy Protectants
J. Clin. Oncol.,
October 1, 1999;
17(10):
3333 - 3355.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. S. Mandelblatt and K. R. Yabroff
Effectiveness of Interventions Designed to Increase Mammography Use: A Meta-Analysis of Provider-targeted Strategies
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.,
September 1, 1999;
8(9):
759 - 767.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. S. Mandelblatt, P. A. Ganz, and K. L. Kahn
Proposed Agenda for the Measurement of Quality-of-Care Outcomes in Oncology Practice
J. Clin. Oncol.,
August 1, 1999;
17(8):
2614 - 2614.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. T. Chlebowski, D. E. Collyar, M. R. Somerfield, and D. G. Pfister
American Society of Clinical Oncology Technology Assessment on Breast Cancer Risk Reduction Strategies: Tamoxifen and Raloxifene
J. Clin. Oncol.,
June 1, 1999;
17(6):
1939 - 1939.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. E. Desch, A. B. Benson III, T. J. Smith, P. J. Flynn, C. Krause, C. L. Loprinzi, B. D. Minsky, N. J. Petrelli, D. G. Pfister, and M. R. Somerfield
Recommended Colorectal Cancer Surveillance Guidelines by the American Society of Clinical Oncology
J. Clin. Oncol.,
April 1, 1999;
17(4):
1312 - 1312.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. J. Smith, N. E. Davidson, D. V. Schapira, E. Grunfeld, H. B. Muss, V. G. Vogel III, and M. R. Somerfield
American Society of Clinical Oncology 1998 Update of Recommended Breast Cancer Surveillance Guidelines
J. Clin. Oncol.,
March 1, 1999;
17(3):
1080 - 1080.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. C. Malfair Taylor
"C" is for costs, and cancer, and conference: Highlights of the First European Conference on the Economics of Cancer
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice,
June 1, 1998;
4(2):
125 - 128.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. C. Gotay and M. Wilson
Use of Quality-of-Life Outcome Assessments in Current Cancer Clinical Trials
Eval Health Prof,
June 1, 1998;
21(2):
157 - 178.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|