Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Lena, M.
Right arrow Articles by Gargano, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by De Lena, M.
Right arrow Articles by Gargano, G.

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 15, 3208-3213, Copyright © 1997 by American Society of Clinical Oncology


ARTICLES

Revertant and potentiating activity of lonidamine in patients with ovarian cancer previously treated with platinum

M De Lena, V Lorusso, C Bottalico, M Brandi, A De Mitrio, A Catino, M Guida, A Latorre, B Leone, C Vallejo and G Gargano
Medical Oncology Division, Oncology Institute, Bari, Italy. vlor@mail5.clio.it

PURPOSE: Lonidamine (LND) is an energolytic derivative of indazol- carboxylic acid that has been shown to enhance cisplatin (CDDP) activity in both sensitive (A2780) and resistant (A2780/Cp8) ovarian cancer cell lines. The aim of this study was to confirm the potentiating or reverting activity of LND on CDDP activity obtained in experimental models in a phase II study of advanced ovarian cancer patients previously treated with platinum-based regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven consecutive women with histologically proven and measurable ovarian cancer previously treated with platinum compounds were treated with CDDP plus LND. CDDP was administered at 1 mg/kg intravenously (IV) once weekly for 6 weeks and every 3 weeks thereafter until disease progression or toxicity. LND was administered at 450 mg daily (1 tablet every 8 hours) for the entire period of therapy starting 3 days before the first CDDP administration. In addition, a higher LND dosage was provided on the day of CDDP administration in an attempt to maximize the synergy of this drug with CDDP. RESULTS: Ten patients achieved a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) for an overall response rate of 37% (95% confidence interval [CI], 19% to 55%). In particular, responses were observed in five of 18 (28%) refractory or early relapsed patients (one CR and four PRs) and in five of nine patients (55%) in the late-relapsed group (two CRs and three PRs). Grade 3 or 4 anemia, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia were observed in 19%, 15%, and 11% of patients, respectively, whereas seven of 27 patients (26%) showed LND-related myalgia. Grade 3 renal toxicity was observed in two patients (8%). Neurotoxicity, often concealed by LND-related myalgia, was recorded as grade 1 or 2 in six patients (22%) and as grade 3 in one (4%). CONCLUSION: The 37% response rate observed in this study (28% in refractory or early-relapsed patients), suggests that the synergism between CDDP and LND observed in vitro against ovarian cancer cell lines can be clinically confirmed. However, larger series and randomized studies are needed to assess definitely the revertant activity of LND on CDDP-refractory patients.




About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 1997 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online