Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 15, 1395-1400, Copyright © 1997 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

ARTICLES

Dose-intensive vinorelbine with concurrent granulocyte colony- stimulating factor support in paclitaxel-refractory metastatic breast cancer

RB Livingston, GK Ellis, JR Gralow, MA Williams, R White, C McGuirt, BB Adamkiewicz and CA Long
Division of Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle 98195-6043, USA. rbl@radonc.washington.edu

PURPOSE: We evaluated weekly single-agent intravenous (IV) vinorelbine as salvage therapy for metastatic breast cancer. After the first five patients, all received elective growth factor support with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; filgrastim) in an attempt to maximize delivered dose-intensity (DDI). Objective tumor response, DDI, and toxicity were assessed, as well as time to progression (TTP) and survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This single-center nonrandomized trial enrolled 40 patients. Anthracycline exposure and subsequent progression were common to all patients, and 38 of 40 were paclitaxel-refractory. Vinorelbine was given initially at 30 mg/m2/wk, then at 35 mg/m2/wk in a phase I/II design, which involved first intermittent (6 days of 7) and then continuous (daily) administration of G-CSF at 5 micrograms/kg. RESULTS: The maximum-tolerated starting dose was 35 mg/m2/wk with continuous G-CSF support. The mean DDI was 27.7 mg/m2/wk for all patients. There were two complete responses (CRs) and eight partial responses (PRs) in 40 assessable patients for an overall response rate of 25% (95% confidence interval [CI], 13% to 41%). The median TTP was 13 weeks and median survival time 33 weeks. The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia, with dose delay or reduction required in 14 of 27 patients entered at 35 mg/m2. Febrile neutropenia that required hospitalization was unusual (three of 40 patients, 8%). There were no treatment-related deaths. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia occurred in nine patients (23%) and 26 patients (65%) required RBC transfusions for anemia. Seven patients (18%) had reversible grade 3/4 nonhematologic complications, primarily related to neurotoxicity. Grade > or = 3 mucositis was absent. CONCLUSION: Concurrent administration of weekly vinoralbine and daily G-CSF is feasible and permits an increase in DDI for vinorelbine of 43% to 76% over that reported in series without growth factor support. The response rate, TTP, and survival data are encouraging for therapy given to heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer. Vinorelbine is not cross-resistant with paclitaxel and should be considered for further trials in the dose- intensified mode made possible by G-CSF, alone or combined with other agents.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Mrozek, J. Kolesar, D. Young, J. Allen, M. Villalona-Calero, and C. L. Shapiro Phase II study of sequentially administered low-dose mitomycin-C (MMC) and irinotecan (CPT-11) in women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) Ann. Onc., August 1, 2008; 19(8): 1417 - 1422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Verma and M. Clemons First-Line Treatment Options for Patients with HER-2 Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: The Impact of Modern Adjuvant Chemotherapy Oncologist, July 1, 2007; 12(7): 785 - 797. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Gelmon, A. Chan, and N. Harbeck The Role of Capecitabine in First-Line Treatment for Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer Oncologist, September 1, 2006; 11(suppl_1): 42 - 51. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Papaldo, A. Fabi, G. Ferretti, M. Mottolese, A. M. Cianciulli, B. Di Cocco, M. S. Pino, P. Carlini, S. Di Cosimo, I. Sacchi, et al. A phase II study on metastatic breast cancer patients treated with weekly vinorelbine with or without trastuzumab according to HER2 expression: changing the natural history of HER2-positive disease Ann. Onc., April 1, 2006; 17(4): 630 - 636. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Baweja, V. J. Suman, T. R. Fitch, J. A. Mailliard, A. Bernath, K. M. Rowland, S. R. Alberts, J. S. Kaur, and E. A. Perez Phase II trial of oral vinorelbine for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer in patients >=65 years of age: an NCCTG study Ann. Onc., April 1, 2006; 17(4): 623 - 629. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Toi, T. Saeki, K. Aogi, M. Sano, K. Hatake, T. Asaga, Y. Tokuda, S. Mitsuyama, M. Kimura, T. Kobayashi, et al. Late Phase II Clinical Study of Vinorelbine Monotherapy in Advanced or Recurrent Breast Cancer Previously Treated with Anthracyclines and Taxanes Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2005; 35(6): 310 - 315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. A. Perez, D. W. Hillman, J. A. Mailliard, J. N. Ingle, J. M. Ryan, T. R. Fitch, K. M. Rowland, C. G. Kardinal, J. E. Krook, J. W. Kugler, et al. Randomized Phase II Study of Two Irinotecan Schedules for Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer Refractory to an Anthracycline, a Taxane, or Both J. Clin. Oncol., July 15, 2004; 22(14): 2849 - 2855. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Reichardt, G. von Minckwitz, P. C. Thuss-Patience, W. Jonat, H. Kolbl, F. Janicke, D. G. Kieback, W. Kuhn, A. E Schindler, S. Mohrmann, et al. Multicenter phase II study of oral capecitabine (Xeloda") in patients with metastatic breast cancer relapsing after treatment with a taxane-containing therapy Ann. Onc., August 1, 2003; 14(8): 1227 - 1233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Martin, M. Spielmann, M. Namer, A. duBois, C. Unger, D. Dodwell, P. Vodvarka, M. Lind, H. Calvert, A. Casado, et al. Phase II study of pemetrexed in breast cancer patients pretreated with anthracyclines Ann. Onc., August 1, 2003; 14(8): 1246 - 1252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. D. Seidman, J. O'Shaughnessy, and J.-L. Misset Single-Agent Capecitabine: A Reference Treatment for Taxane-Pretreated Metastatic Breast Cancer? Oncologist, December 1, 2002; 7(90006): 20 - 28. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. K. Ellis, R. B. Livingston, J. R. Gralow, S. J. Green, and T. Thompson Dose-Dense Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy for Node-Positive Breast Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2002; 20(17): 3637 - 3643. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Summerhayes Capecitabine: a novel, orally administered, tumour-activated treatment for breast cancer Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice, March 1, 2002; 8(1): 1 - 17. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Toppmeyer, A. D. Seidman, M. Pollak, C. Russell, K. Tkaczuk, S. Verma, B. Overmoyer, V. Garg, E. Ette, M. W. Harding, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the Multidrug Resistance Inhibitor Incel (Biricodar; VX-710) in Combination with Paclitaxel for Advanced Breast Cancer Refractory to Paclitaxel Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2002; 8(3): 670 - 678. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. P. Stathopoulos, S. K. Rigatos, N. Pergantas, D. Tsavdarides, I. Athanasiadis, N. A. Malamos, and J. G. Stathopoulos Phase II Trial of Biweekly Administration of Vinorelbine and Gemcitabine in Pretreated Advanced Breast Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 2002; 20(1): 37 - 41. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. J. Esteva, V. Valero, L. Pusztai, L. Boehnke-Michaud, A. U. Buzdar, and G. N. Hortobagyi Chemotherapy of Metastatic Breast Cancer: What to Expect in 2001 and Beyond Oncologist, April 1, 2001; 6(2): 133 - 146. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				G. K. Ellis, J. R. Gralow, H. I. Pierce, M. A. Williams, and R. B. Livingston Infusional Paclitaxel and Weekly Vinorelbine Chemotherapy With Concurrent Filgrastim for Metastatic Breast Cancer: High Complete Response Rate in a Phase I-II Study of Doxorubicin-Treated Patients J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 1999; 17(5): 1407 - 1407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Blum, S. E. Jones, A. U. Buzdar, P. M. LoRusso, I. Kuter, C. Vogel, B. Osterwalder, H.-U. Burger, C. S. Brown, and T. Griffin Multicenter Phase II Study of Capecitabine in Paclitaxel-Refractory Metastatic Breast Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., February 1, 1999; 17(2): 485 - 485. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. L. Vogel and J.-M. Nabholtz Monotherapy of Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Review of Newer Agents Oncologist, February 1, 1999; 4(1): 17 - 33. [Abstract] [Full Text]