Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Martz, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Martz, K.

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 15, 1897-1905, Copyright © 1997 by American Society of Clinical Oncology


ARTICLES

Cyclophosphamide and fluorouracil combined with mitoxantrone versus doxorubicin for breast cancer: superiority of doxorubicin

DJ Stewart, WK Evans, FA Shepherd, KS Wilson, KI Pritchard, ME Trudeau, JJ Wilson and K Martz
Division of Medical Oncology, Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre, Ontario, Canada. dstewart@octrf.on.ca

PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a randomized, multicenter study of intravenous cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 plus fluorouracil 500 mg/m2 combined with either mitoxantrone (Novantrone, Lederle Cyanamid Canada Ltd, Willowdale, Ontario) 10 mg/m2 (CNF) or doxorubicin (Adriamycin, Adria Laboratories of Canada Ltd, Mississauga, Ontario) 50 mg/m2 (CAF) every 3 weeks in advanced breast cancer. RESULTS: The response rate in 249 randomized patients was 36% with CNF (44 of 121) and 48% with CAF (62 of 128) (P = .054), with complete remissions in 10 patients (8.3%) on CNF and in 13 (10.2%) on CAF. If only fully assessable patients are considered, the response rate was 48% (44 of 91) with CNF and 60% (62 of 103) with CAF (P = .098). At time of analysis, all except 10 patients (one CNF and nine CAF) had died. The median survival time with CAF was longer than with CNF (15.2 v 10.9 months; P = .003), and time to progression was also longer with CAF (5.3 v 3.2 months; P < .03). Survival differences remained significant (P = .006) if patients who failed to meet all eligibility criteria were excluded. Favorable prognostic factors for survival in a Cox regression model included good performance status (P < .0001); less than two organ systems involved by tumor (P < .0001); no involvement of lung, liver, or brain (P < .003); involvement of bone or bone marrow (P < .009), prior surgery for breast cancer (P < .006); being premenopausal (P < .03); > or = 3 years from diagnosis until randomization on this study (P < .03); and treatment with CAF (P < .03). Alopecia > or = grade 3 was reported in 55% of patients with CAF and 12% of patients with CNF (P < .001), while other > or = grade 3 toxicities did not differ significantly. Priestman-Baum quality-of-life assessment was comparable on the two study arms. CONCLUSION: In patients with advanced breast cancer, CAF was associated with longer survival than was CNF, with an increase in alopecia, but not in other toxicities.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
D. Mauri, N. P. Polyzos, G. Salanti, N. Pavlidis, and J. P. A. Ioannidis
Multiple-Treatments Meta-analysis of Chemotherapy and Targeted Therapies in Advanced Breast Cancer
J Natl Cancer Inst, December 17, 2008; 100(24): 1780 - 1791.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
I. N. Rich and K. M. Hall
Validation and Development of a Predictive Paradigm for Hemotoxicology Using a Multifunctional Bioluminescence Colony-Forming Proliferation Assay
Toxicol. Sci., October 1, 2005; 87(2): 427 - 441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S.E. Jones, J. Erban, B. Overmoyer, G.T. Budd, L. Hutchins, E. Lower, L. Laufman, S. Sundaram, W.J. Urba, K.I. Pritchard, et al.
Randomized Phase III Study of Docetaxel Compared With Paclitaxel in Metastatic Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., August 20, 2005; 23(24): 5542 - 5551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
P. J. Goodwin, J. T. Black, L. J. Bordeleau, and P. A. Ganz
Health-Related Quality-of-Life Measurement in Randomized Clinical Trials in Breast Cancer--Taking Stock
J Natl Cancer Inst, February 19, 2003; 95(4): 263 - 281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
L. Zelek, P. Cottu, M. Tubiana-Hulin, J.-M. Vannetzel, Ph. Chollet, J.-L. Misset, N. Chouaki, M. Marty, E. Gamelin, S. Culine, et al.
Phase II Study of Oxaliplatin and Fluorouracil in Taxane- and Anthracycline-Pretreated Breast Cancer Patients
J. Clin. Oncol., May 15, 2002; 20(10): 2551 - 2558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
R. Fossati, C. Confalonieri, G. Apolone, S. Cavuto, and S. Garattini
Does a drug do better when it is new?
Ann. Onc., March 1, 2002; 13(3): 470 - 473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
G. Chaplain, C. Milan, C. Sgro, P.-M. Carli, and C. Bonithon-Kopp
Increased Risk of Acute Leukemia After Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Study
J. Clin. Oncol., August 15, 2000; 18(15): 2836 - 2842.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 1997 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online