Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harari, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harari, P. M.

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 15, 2050-2055, Copyright © 1997 by American Society of Clinical Oncology


ARTICLES

Why has induction chemotherapy for advanced head and neck cancer become a United States community standard of practice?

PM Harari
Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine, Madison 53792-0600, USA. harari@humonc.wisc.edu

PURPOSE: Induction chemotherapy for advanced head and neck (H&N) cancer has been studied in clinical trials for more than two decades without clear demonstration of benefit for locoregional tumor control or overall patient survival. Nonetheless, its use has become a common community standard of practice in the United States (US). This report examines some of the factors that may have contributed to this phenomenon. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A mail survey was conducted of 300 US community cancer specialists (equally divided among otolaryngologists, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists) to solicit their most frequent therapy approach for patients with locoregionally advanced, nonmetastatic H&N cancer. The rationale for selection of treatment strategy was identified by each respondent. RESULTS: Two hundred eighteen physicians (73%) completed and returned the survey, representing 47 US states. The single most common treatment approach reported for patients with locoregionally advanced H&N cancer was that of sequential chemoradiation (61%), specifically, induction chemotherapy with fluorouracil (5-FU)/cisplatin followed by radiation therapy. Four percent of respondents indicated that induction chemotherapy was administered within the context of a controlled clinical trial, whereas 96% indicated that therapy was administered off study. The primary objectives cited by respondents for the use of induction chemotherapy included the desire to improve locoregional tumor control (67%), to improve overall survival (56%), to maintain a spirit of multidisciplinary care (34%), to improve quality of life (29%), and to decrease distant metastases (26%). CONCLUSION: Review of the published trials between 1970 and 1995 and of the published meta- analyses show no clear evidence for an improvement in locoregional tumor control or survival for H&N cancer patients treated with 5- FU/cisplatin induction chemotherapy regimens. Nonetheless, this induction chemotherapy approach for advanced H&N cancer patients has become a dominant community practice in the US. Factors that may have contributed to this paradox are reviewed.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
J. Peppercorn, H. Burstein, F. G. Miller, E. Winer, and S. Joffe
Self-Reported Practices and Attitudes of US Oncologists Regarding Off-Protocol Therapy
J. Clin. Oncol., December 20, 2008; 26(36): 5994 - 6000.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
A. Eisbruch
Commentary: Induction Chemotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer: Hypothesis-Based Rather Than Evidence-Based Medicine
Oncologist, August 1, 2007; 12(8): 975 - 977.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
R. Hitt, A. Lopez-Pousa, J. Martinez-Trufero, V. Escrig, J. Carles, A. Rizo, D. Isla, M. E. Vega, J. L. Marti, F. Lobo, et al.
Phase III Study Comparing Cisplatin Plus Fluorouracil to Paclitaxel, Cisplatin, and Fluorouracil Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., December 1, 2005; 23(34): 8636 - 8645.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
L. Licitra and J. B. Vermorken
Is there still a role for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in head and neck cancer?
Ann. Onc., January 1, 2004; 15(1): 7 - 11.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
R. Haddad, R. B. Tishler, C. M. Norris, A. Mahadevan, P. Busse, L. Wirth, L. A. Goguen, C. A. Sullivan, R. Costello, M. A. Case, et al.
Docetaxel, Cisplatin, 5-Fluorouracil (TPF)-Based Induction Chemotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer and the Case for Sequential, Combined-Modality Treatment
Oncologist, February 1, 2003; 8(1): 35 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
L. Licitra, C. Grandi, M. Guzzo, L. Mariani, S. L. Vullo, F. Valvo, P. Quattrone, P. Valagussa, G. Bonadonna, R. Molinari, et al.
Primary Chemotherapy in Resectable Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial
J. Clin. Oncol., January 15, 2003; 21(2): 327 - 333.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
R. Hitt, L. Paz-Ares, A. Brandariz, D. Castellano, C. Pena, J. M. Millan, F. Calvo, D. Ortiz de Urbina, E. Lopez, J. J. Alvarez-Vicent, et al.
Induction chemotherapy with paclitaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: long-term results of a phase II trial
Ann. Onc., October 1, 2002; 13(10): 1665 - 1673.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
R. A. ORD and R. H. BLANCHAERT JR
Current management of oral cancer: A multidisciplinary approach
J Am Dent Assoc, November 1, 2001; 132(suppl_1): 19S - 23S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
J. L. Barrera, E. Verastegui, A. Meneses, J. Zinser, J. de la Garza, and J. W. Hadden
Combination Immunotherapy of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A Phase 2 Trial
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, March 1, 2000; 126(3): 345 - 351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
W. M. Mendenhall, S. P. Stringer, R. J. Amdur, R. W. Hinerman, G. J. Moore-Higgs, and N. J. Cassisi
Is Radiation Therapy a Preferred Alternative to Surgery for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Base of Tongue?
J. Clin. Oncol., January 5, 2000; 18(1): 35 - 35.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
G. Calais, M. Alfonsi, E. Bardet, C. Sire, T. Germain, P. Bergerot, B. Rhein, J. Tortochaux, P. Oudinot, and P. Bertrand
Randomized Trial of Radiation Therapy Versus Concomitant Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy for Advanced-Stage Oropharynx Carcinoma
J Natl Cancer Inst, December 15, 1999; 91(24): 2081 - 2086.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
H. T. Hoffman, L. H. Karnell, G. F. Funk, R. A. Robinson, and H. R. Menck
The National Cancer Data Base Report on Cancer of the Head and Neck
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, September 1, 1998; 124(9): 951 - 962.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
D. M. Brizel, M. E. Albers, S. R. Fisher, R. L. Scher, W. J. Richtsmeier, V. Hars, S. L. George, A. T. Huang, and L. R. Prosnitz
Hyperfractionated Irradiation with or without Concurrent Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med., June 18, 1998; 338(25): 1798 - 1804.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 1997 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online