Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 15, 2157-2169, Copyright © 1997 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

ARTICLES

Resource document for curriculum development in cancer genetics education. American Society of Clinical Oncology

PURPOSE: The rapid growth in the use of genetic testing for heritable cancers and other diseases has led to the establishment of many committees to assess the status and future implications of such testing. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) published a statement on genetic testing for cancer susceptibility in May 1996. In that statement, ASCO recognized the need for a major initiative to develop courses and other educational materials for ASCO members and other health care professionals that were pertinent to cancer genetics and the role of cancer predisposition testing in clinical oncology. These curriculum guidelines represent an effort to promote formal instruction on the assessment and management of familial cancer risks in training programs and continuing education courses. DESIGN AND RESULTS: An Ad hoc Task Force was created from the ASCO membership and other professional organizations. Goals of ASCO's cancer genetics education initiative, curriculum guidelines, and plans for implementation of the curriculum have been developed. To gain understanding and competency in cancer genetics and cancer predisposition testing, the curriculum emphasizes formal instruction in: (1) basic concepts and principles of genetics; (2) an understanding of the role of genetics in the etiology, diagnosis, and management of different malignancies; (3) an understanding of the ethical, legal, and social issues that surround predisposition testing; and (4) long-term management plans for individuals at high risk for cancer. This document is broad in scope and applicable to all types of malignancies. It should be considered as the framework around which cancer genetics education is developed. It is expected that implementation of training activities over the next few years will allow ASCO to fulfill its obligations to the membership. CONCLUSION: This curriculum should prove a valuable guide to those who wish further education on cancer genetics and the appropriate use of cancer predisposition testing.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. Burke Contributions of Public Health to Genetics Education for Health Care Professionals Health Educ Behav, October 1, 2005; 32(5): 668 - 675. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. E. Garber and K. Offit Hereditary Cancer Predisposition Syndromes J. Clin. Oncol., January 10, 2005; 23(2): 276 - 292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K R Blazer, M Grant, S R Sand, D J MacDonald, G C Uman, and J N Weitzel Effects of a cancer genetics education programme on clinician knowledge and practice J. Med. Genet., July 1, 2004; 41(7): 518 - 522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Gray and O. I. Olopade Direct-to-Consumer Marketing of Genetic Tests for Cancer: Buyer Beware J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2003; 21(17): 3191 - 3193. [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. I. Olopade, K. Offit, and J. E. Garber Genetic Testing for Susceptibility to Cancer JAMA, May 27, 1998; 279(20): 1612 - 1613. [Full Text] [PDF]