Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 15, 2385-2393, Copyright © 1997 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
Carcinoma of unknown primary site: treatment with 1-hour paclitaxel, carboplatin, and extended-schedule etoposide
JD Hainsworth, JB Erland, LA Kalman, MT Schreeder and FA Greco
Sarah Cannon-Minnie Pearl Cancer Center, Centennial Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203, USA.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a novel chemotherapy
combination that includes paclitaxel, carboplatin, and extended- schedule
etoposide in the treatment of patients with carcinoma of unknown primary
tumor site. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-five patients with carcinoma of
unknown primary tumor site were treated with the following regimen,
administered every 21 days: paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 by 1-hour intravenous
(I.V.) infusion on day 1, carboplatin at an estimated area under the
concentration-time curve (AUC) of 6.0 on day 1, and etoposide 50 mg
alternated with 100 mg orally on days 1 through 10. Responding patients
received a total of four courses of treatment. The following histologies
were included: adenocarcinoma, 30 patients; poorly differentiated carcinoma
(PDC) or poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (PDA), 21; poorly
differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma, three; and squamous carcinoma,
one. RESULTS: Twenty-five of 53 assessable patients (47%; 95% confidence
interval [CI], 33% to 61%) had major objective responses to treatment
(seven complete responses). Response rates were similar in patients with
adenocarcinoma versus PDC (45% and 48%, respectively). The actuarial median
survival time for the entire group was 13.4 months. The regimen was well
tolerated, with only seven hospitalizations for treatment of neutropenia
and fever (4% of courses) and no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION: The
combination of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and extended-schedule etoposide is
highly active and well tolerated in patients with carcinoma of unknown
primary tumor site. Response rates and survival in this multicenter
community- based trial compare favorably with all previously studied
empiric regimens. In addition, this regimen is substantially less toxic and
easier to administer than the cisplatin-based regimens previously used in
this setting. If this level of efficacy is confirmed, this treatment should
be considered standard first-line therapy in patients with carcinoma of
unknown primary tumor site.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. R. Varadhachary, D. Talantov, M. N. Raber, C. Meng, K. R. Hess, T. Jatkoe, R. Lenzi, D. R. Spigel, Y. Wang, F. A. Greco, et al.
Molecular Profiling of Carcinoma of Unknown Primary and Correlation With Clinical Evaluation
J. Clin. Oncol.,
September 20, 2008;
26(27):
4442 - 4448.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. D. Hainsworth, D. R. Spigel, S. Litchy, and F. A. Greco
Phase II Trial of Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, and Etoposide in Advanced Poorly Differentiated Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: A Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network Study
J. Clin. Oncol.,
August 1, 2006;
24(22):
3548 - 3554.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. S Sano, J A. Waddell, D. A Solimando Jr, P. Doulaveris, and R. Myhand
Study of the effect of standardized chemotherapy order forms on prescribing errors and anti-emetic cost
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice,
March 1, 2005;
11(1):
21 - 30.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. H. Park, B.-Y. Ryoo, S.-J. Choi, S. H. Yang, and H.-T. Kim
A Phase II Study of Paclitaxel plus Cisplatin Chemotherapy in an Unfavourable Group of Patients with Cancer of Unknown Primary Site
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol.,
November 1, 2004;
34(11):
681 - 685.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. A. Greco, G. I. Rodriguez, D. W. Shaffer, R. Hermann, S. Litchy, D. A. Yardley, H. A. Burris III, L. H. Morrissey, J. B. Erland, and J. D. Hainsworth
Carcinoma of Unknown Primary Site: Sequential Treatment with Paclitaxel/Carboplatin/Etoposide and Gemcitabine/Irinotecan: A Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network Phase II Trial
Oncologist,
November 1, 2004;
9(6):
644 - 652.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. M. Mintzer, M. Warhol, A.-M. Martin, and G. Greene
Cancer of Unknown Primary: Changing Approaches. A Multidisciplinary Case Presentation from the Joan Karnell Cancer Center of Pennsylvania Hospital
Oncologist,
June 1, 2004;
9(3):
330 - 338.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Balana, J.-L. Manzano, I. Moreno, B. Cirauqui, A. Abad, A. Font, J.-L. Mate, and R. Rosell
A phase II study of cisplatin, etoposide and gemcitabine in an unfavourable group of patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site
Ann. Onc.,
September 1, 2003;
14(9):
1425 - 1429.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. J. van de Wouw, R. L. H. Jansen, E. J. M. Speel, and H. F. P. Hillen
The unknown biology of the unknown primary tumour: a literature review
Ann. Onc.,
February 1, 2003;
14(2):
191 - 196.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. A. Greco, H. A. Burris III, S. Litchy, J. H. Barton, J. E. Bradof, P. Richards, D. C. Scullin Jr, J. B. Erland, L. H. Morrissey, and J. D. Hainsworth
Gemcitabine, Carboplatin, and Paclitaxel for Patients With Carcinoma of Unknown Primary Site: A Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network Study
J. Clin. Oncol.,
March 15, 2002;
20(6):
1651 - 1656.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Hidalgo, C. Aylesworth, L. A. Hammond, C. D. Britten, G. Weiss, J. Stephenson Jr, G. Schwartz, A. Patnaik, L. Smith, K. Molpus, et al.
Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of BMS-184476, a Taxane With Greater Potency and Solubility Than Paclitaxel
J. Clin. Oncol.,
May 1, 2001;
19(9):
2493 - 2503.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H F P Hillen
Unknown primary tumours
Postgrad. Med. J.,
November 1, 2000;
76(901):
690 - 693.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Briasoulis, H. Kalofonos, D. Bafaloukos, E. Samantas, G. Fountzilas, N. Xiros, D. Skarlos, C. Christodoulou, P. Kosmidis, and N. Pavlidis
Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel in Unknown Primary Carcinoma: A Phase II Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group Study
J. Clin. Oncol.,
September 17, 2000;
18(17):
3101 - 3107.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. G. Rose, M. Rodriguez, S. Waggoner, B. E. Greer, I. R. Horowitz, J. M. Fowler, and W. P. McGuire
Phase I Study of Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, and Increasing Days of Prolonged Oral Etoposide in Ovarian, Peritoneal, and Tubal Carcinoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study
J. Clin. Oncol.,
August 16, 2000;
18(16):
2957 - 2962.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|