Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Horne, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Mayo, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Horne, M. K., 3rd
Right arrow Articles by Mayo, D. J.

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 15, 2709-2714, Copyright © 1997 by American Society of Clinical Oncology


ARTICLES

Low-dose urokinase infusions to treat fibrinous obstruction of venous access devices in cancer patients

MK Horne 3rd and DJ Mayo
Clinical Pathology Department, Warren G. Magnuson Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. mhorne@nih.gov

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to determine the role of low-dose urokinase infusions in treating fibrinous occlusions of venous access devices (VADs) in cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-two patients with VAD occlusions refractory to routine urokinase instillations were documented by x-ray (cathetergram) to have fibrin sleeves at the catheter tips. They were randomized to receive infusions of either urokinase (40,000 U/h) or urokinase with heparin (320 U/h) through their catheters. After 1, 3, 6, and 12 hours of treatment, the function of the VADs was reassessed. Whenever the obstruction had been relieved, the infusion was stopped and a repeat cathetergram was performed. The status of the unoccluded catheters was followed to determine the longevity of the restored function. RESULTS: Twenty-one catheters were treated with urokinase alone and 21 with the combination of urokinase and heparin. In each group, 16 VADs opened within 12 hours of treatment and five did not. By actuarial analysis, the probability was only 0.28 that a reopened catheter would reocclude within 6 months. CONCLUSION: Low-dose urokinase infusions can restore function to the majority of catheters occluded by fibrin sleeves. Adding heparin to the urokinase does not enhance the efficacy of the infusions. The restored function often persists until the VADs are removed.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
M. Verso and G. Agnelli
Venous Thromboembolism Associated With Long-Term Use of Central Venous Catheters in Cancer Patients
J. Clin. Oncol., October 1, 2003; 21(19): 3665 - 3675.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 1997 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online