Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 15, 2966-2973, Copyright © 1997 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
Phase III double-blind comparison of dolasetron mesylate and ondansetron and an evaluation of the additive role of dexamethasone in the prevention of acute and delayed nausea and vomiting due to moderately emetogenic chemotherapy
WS Lofters, JL Pater, B Zee, E Dempsey, D Walde, JP Moquin, K Wilson, P Hoskins, RM Guevin, S Verma, R Navari, JE Krook, J Hainsworth, M Palmer and C Chin
Kingston Regional Cancer Centre, and National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group, Ontario.
PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of dolasetron and ondansetron in
controlling nausea and vomiting in the first 24 hours; to evaluate the
efficacy when dexamethasone is added to either drug in the first 24 hours;
and to extend these comparisons over 7 days in patients receiving
moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a
multicenter, double-blind, randomized study with six parallel arms that
used a 2 x 2 factorial design in chemotherapy-naive patients. In arm 1,
dolasetron (2.4 mg/kg) was given intravenously (I.V.) prechemotherapy,
followed 24 hours later by oral dolasetron (200 mg once daily) for 6 days.
Arms 2 and 3 consisted of dolasetron and dexamethasone 8 mg I.V., followed
24 hours later by oral dexamethasone (8 mg once daily) in one arm, and oral
dexamethasone and dolasetron in the other, also for 6 days. In arms 4, 5,
and 6, ondansetron (32 mg I.V. or 8 mg orally twice daily) was administered
in a similar manner to arms 1, 2, and 3 before and 24 hours after
chemotherapy. Mean nausea severity (MNS) was assessed on a visual analog
scale (VAS) in a daily diary. RESULTS: Of 703 patients enrolled, 696 were
eligible. There were 343 dolasetron- and 353 ondansetron-treated patients;
57% of dolasetron- treated patients had complete protection in the first 24
hours versus 67% of patients who received ondansetron (P = .013). MNS was
also more pronounced on the dolasetron arm (P = .051). Sixty-seven percent
of patients who received added dexamethasone in the first 24 hours had
complete protection, compared with 55% without dexamethasone (P < .001).
MNS was significantly reduced with the addition of dexamethasone (P <
.001). At 7 days, dolasetron and ondansetron had equivalent complete
protection rates (36% and 39%, respectively). With the addition of
dexamethasone, 48% of patients compared with 28% had complete protection (P
< .001). MNS was significantly improved with added dexamethasone (P <
.001). CONCLUSION: At the doses used, dolasetron was significantly less
effective than ondansetron at controlling nausea and vomiting in the first
24 hours in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy, but
there was no demonstrable difference between both drugs over 7 days. The
addition of dexamethasone significantly improved the efficacy of both drugs
in the first 24 hours and over 7 days.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. G. Kris, P. J. Hesketh, M. R. Somerfield, P. Feyer, R. Clark-Snow, J. M. Koeller, G. R. Morrow, L. W. Chinnery, M. J. Chesney, R. J. Gralla, et al.
American Society of Clinical Oncology Guideline for Antiemetics in Oncology: Update 2006
J. Clin. Oncol.,
June 20, 2006;
24(18):
2932 - 2947.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. G. Warr, P. J. Hesketh, R. J. Gralla, H. B. Muss, J. Herrstedt, P. D. Eisenberg, H. Raftopoulos, S. M. Grunberg, M. Gabriel, A. Rodgers, et al.
Efficacy and Tolerability of Aprepitant for the Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Patients With Breast Cancer After Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy
J. Clin. Oncol.,
April 20, 2005;
23(12):
2822 - 2830.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Constenla
5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists for Prevention of Late Acute-Onset Emesis
Ann. Pharmacother.,
October 1, 2004;
38(10):
1683 - 1691.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. M Navari and J. M Koeller
Electrocardiographic and Cardiovascular Effects of the 5-Hydroxytryptamine3 Receptor Antagonists
Ann. Pharmacother.,
September 1, 2003;
37(9):
1276 - 1286.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Ellis and N. Dozier
Evidence for Equivalent Electrocardiographic Changes Among the 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists
Oncologist,
April 1, 2003;
8(2):
216 - 218.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Goodin and R. Cunningham
5-HT3-Receptor Antagonists for the Treatment of Nausea and Vomiting: A Reappraisal of Their Side-Effect Profile
Oncologist,
October 1, 2002;
7(5):
424 - 436.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. L. Keefe
The Cardiotoxic Potential of the 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonist Antiemetics: Is There Cause for Concern?
Oncologist,
February 1, 2002;
7(1):
65 - 72.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. P. A. Ioannidis, P. J. Hesketh, and J. Lau
Contribution of Dexamethasone to Control of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Evidence
J. Clin. Oncol.,
October 19, 2000;
18(19):
3409 - 3422.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. W. Valley
A review of dolasetron as management of nausea and vomiting in cancer patients
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice,
September 1, 2000;
6(3_suppl):
S28 - S40.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J. Gralla, D. Osoba, M. G. Kris, P. Kirkbride, P. J. Hesketh, L. W. Chinnery, R. Clark-Snow, D. P. Gill, S. Groshen, S. Grunberg, et al.
Recommendations for the Use of Antiemetics: Evidence-Based, Clinical Practice Guidelines
J. Clin. Oncol.,
September 1, 1999;
17(9):
2971 - 2971.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|