Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guadagnoli, E.
Right arrow Articles by Soumerai, S. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guadagnoli, E.
Right arrow Articles by Soumerai, S. B.

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 16, 101-106, Copyright © 1998 by American Society of Clinical Oncology


ARTICLES

Use of breast-conserving surgery for treatment of stage I and stage II breast cancer

E Guadagnoli, JC Weeks, CL Shapiro, JH Gurwitz, C Borbas and SB Soumerai
Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA. guadagnoli@hcp.med.harvard.edu

PURPOSE: To assess the use of breast-conserving surgery in two states reported to differ with respect to surgical treatment of breast cancer. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study based on data collected from medical records and patients was performed among 1,514 patients diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer in Massachusetts and 1,061 patients in Minnesota. Patients were identified at 18 randomly selected hospitals in Massachusetts and at 30 hospitals in Minnesota. The rate of breast-conserving surgery in both states and the correlates of breast-conserving surgery among women eligible for the procedure were determined. RESULTS: The rate of breast-conserving surgery in both states was much higher than previously reported. Among those eligible for the procedure, nearly 75% underwent breast-conserving surgery in Massachusetts and nearly half did so in Minnesota. Significantly (P < .003) more women who underwent mastectomy in Minnesota (27%) than in Massachusetts (15%) reported that their surgeon did not discuss breast- conserving surgery with them. Among women who underwent mastectomy and who reported being informed of both surgical alternatives, more women (P < .001) in Minnesota (74%) than in Massachusetts (62%) said they ultimately chose mastectomy because their surgeon recommended it. In Massachusetts, women treated at teaching hospitals were twice as likely as other women to undergo breast-conserving surgery. In Minnesota, women over age 70 and those who lived in rural areas were less likely than other women to undergo breast-conserving surgery. CONCLUSION: Although the rate of breast-conserving surgery in each state was higher than expected based on earlier reports, the rates differed considerably between states. Additional studies are needed to determine whether variation in practice between geographic areas is due to differences in patients' preferences and values or to surgeons' propensity for one type of surgery based on where they practice.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
D. Opatt, M. Morrow, S. Hawley, K. Schwartz, N. K. Janz, and S. J. Katz
Conflicts in Decision-Making for Breast Cancer Surgery
Ann. Surg. Oncol., September 1, 2007; 14(9): 2463 - 2469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
K. A. Vanderveen, D. A. Paterniti, R. L. Kravitz, and R. J. Bold
Diffusion of Surgical Techniques in Early Stage Breast Cancer: Variables Related to Adoption and Implementation of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
Ann. Surg. Oncol., May 1, 2007; 14(5): 1662 - 1669.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
S. Latosinsky, K. Fradette, L. Lix, K. Hildebrand, and D. Turner
Canadian breast cancer guidelines: Have they made a difference?
Can. Med. Assoc. J., March 13, 2007; 176(6): 771 - 776.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
E. P. McCarthy, L. H. Ngo, R. G. Roetzheim, T. N. Chirikos, D. Li, R. E. Drews, and L. I. Iezzoni
Disparities in breast cancer treatment and survival for women with disabilities.
Ann Intern Med, November 7, 2006; 145(9): 637 - 645.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
W. J. Temple, M. L. Russell, L. L. Parsons, S. M. Huber, C. A. Jones., J. Bankes, and M. Eliasziw
Conservation Surgery for Breast Cancer As the Preferred Choice: A Prospective Analysis
J. Clin. Oncol., July 20, 2006; 24(21): 3367 - 3373.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
T. Whelan, M. Levine, A. Willan, A. Gafni, K. Sanders, D. Mirsky, S. Chambers, M. A. O'Brien, S. Reid, and S. Dubois
Effect of a Decision Aid on Knowledge and Treatment Decision Making for Breast Cancer Surgery: A Randomized Trial
JAMA, July 28, 2004; 292(4): 435 - 441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
A. W. Dibbins
Legacy
Arch Surg, April 1, 2004; 139(4): 362 - 365.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
N. N. Baxter, B. A. Virnig, S. B. Durham, and T. M. Tuttle
Trends in the Treatment of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast
J Natl Cancer Inst, March 17, 2004; 96(6): 443 - 448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
N. L. Keating, M. B. Landrum, J. Z. Ayanian, E. P. Winer, and E. Guadagnoli
Consultation With a Medical Oncologist Before Surgery and Type of Surgery Among Elderly Women With Early-Stage Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., December 15, 2003; 21(24): 4532 - 4539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
D. Polsky, J. S. Mandelblatt, J. C. Weeks, L. Venditti, Y.-T. Hwang, H. A. Glick, J. Hadley, and K. A. Schulman
Economic Evaluation of Breast Cancer Treatment: Considering the Value of Patient Choice
J. Clin. Oncol., March 15, 2003; 21(6): 1139 - 1146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
N. L. Keating, E. Guadagnoli, M. B. Landrum, C. Borbas, and J. C. Weeks
Treatment Decision Making in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Should Surgeons Match Patients' Desired Level of Involvement?
J. Clin. Oncol., March 15, 2002; 20(6): 1473 - 1479.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J. L. Warren, M. L. Brown, M. P. Fay, N. Schussler, A. L. Potosky, and G. F. Riley
Costs of Treatment for Elderly Women With Early-Stage Breast Cancer in Fee-for-Service Settings
J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 2002; 20(1): 307 - 316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
V. L. Staradub and M. Morrow
Modified Radical Mastectomy With Knife Technique
Arch Surg, January 1, 2002; 137(1): 105 - 110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
D. I. Gregorio, M. Kulldorff, L. Barry, H. Samocuik, and K. Zarfos
Geographical Differences in Primary Therapy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer
Ann. Surg. Oncol., December 1, 2001; 8(10): 844 - 849.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. Morrow, J. White, J. Moughan, J. Owen, T. Pajack, J. Sylvester, J. Frank Wilson, and D. Winchester
Factors Predicting the Use of Breast-Conserving Therapy in Stage I and II Breast Carcinoma
J. Clin. Oncol., April 15, 2001; 19(8): 2254 - 2262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
B. E. Hillner, T. J. Smith, and C. E. Desch
Hospital and Physician Volume or Specialization and Outcomes in Cancer Treatment: Importance in Quality of Cancer Care
J. Clin. Oncol., June 11, 2000; 18(11): 2327 - 2340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
H. J. Burstein, S. Gelber, E. Guadagnoli, and J. C. Weeks
Use of Alternative Medicine by Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med., June 3, 1999; 340(22): 1733 - 1739.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
G. F. Riley, A. L. Potosky, C. N. Klabunde, J. L. Warren, and R. Ballard-Barbash
Stage at Diagnosis and Treatment Patterns Among Older Women With Breast Cancer: An HMO and Fee-for-Service Comparison
JAMA, February 24, 1999; 281(8): 720 - 726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 1998 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online