Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 16, 101-106, Copyright © 1998 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
Use of breast-conserving surgery for treatment of stage I and stage II breast cancer
E Guadagnoli, JC Weeks, CL Shapiro, JH Gurwitz, C Borbas and SB Soumerai
Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA. guadagnoli@hcp.med.harvard.edu
PURPOSE: To assess the use of breast-conserving surgery in two states
reported to differ with respect to surgical treatment of breast cancer.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study based on data collected from medical
records and patients was performed among 1,514 patients diagnosed with
early-stage breast cancer in Massachusetts and 1,061 patients in Minnesota.
Patients were identified at 18 randomly selected hospitals in Massachusetts
and at 30 hospitals in Minnesota. The rate of breast-conserving surgery in
both states and the correlates of breast-conserving surgery among women
eligible for the procedure were determined. RESULTS: The rate of
breast-conserving surgery in both states was much higher than previously
reported. Among those eligible for the procedure, nearly 75% underwent
breast-conserving surgery in Massachusetts and nearly half did so in
Minnesota. Significantly (P < .003) more women who underwent mastectomy
in Minnesota (27%) than in Massachusetts (15%) reported that their surgeon
did not discuss breast- conserving surgery with them. Among women who
underwent mastectomy and who reported being informed of both surgical
alternatives, more women (P < .001) in Minnesota (74%) than in
Massachusetts (62%) said they ultimately chose mastectomy because their
surgeon recommended it. In Massachusetts, women treated at teaching
hospitals were twice as likely as other women to undergo breast-conserving
surgery. In Minnesota, women over age 70 and those who lived in rural areas
were less likely than other women to undergo breast-conserving surgery.
CONCLUSION: Although the rate of breast-conserving surgery in each state
was higher than expected based on earlier reports, the rates differed
considerably between states. Additional studies are needed to determine
whether variation in practice between geographic areas is due to
differences in patients' preferences and values or to surgeons' propensity
for one type of surgery based on where they practice.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Opatt, M. Morrow, S. Hawley, K. Schwartz, N. K. Janz, and S. J. Katz
Conflicts in Decision-Making for Breast Cancer Surgery
Ann. Surg. Oncol.,
September 1, 2007;
14(9):
2463 - 2469.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. A. Vanderveen, D. A. Paterniti, R. L. Kravitz, and R. J. Bold
Diffusion of Surgical Techniques in Early Stage Breast Cancer: Variables Related to Adoption and Implementation of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
Ann. Surg. Oncol.,
May 1, 2007;
14(5):
1662 - 1669.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Latosinsky, K. Fradette, L. Lix, K. Hildebrand, and D. Turner
Canadian breast cancer guidelines: Have they made a difference?
Can. Med. Assoc. J.,
March 13, 2007;
176(6):
771 - 776.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. P. McCarthy, L. H. Ngo, R. G. Roetzheim, T. N. Chirikos, D. Li, R. E. Drews, and L. I. Iezzoni
Disparities in breast cancer treatment and survival for women with disabilities.
Ann Intern Med,
November 7, 2006;
145(9):
637 - 645.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. J. Temple, M. L. Russell, L. L. Parsons, S. M. Huber, C. A. Jones., J. Bankes, and M. Eliasziw
Conservation Surgery for Breast Cancer As the Preferred Choice: A Prospective Analysis
J. Clin. Oncol.,
July 20, 2006;
24(21):
3367 - 3373.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Whelan, M. Levine, A. Willan, A. Gafni, K. Sanders, D. Mirsky, S. Chambers, M. A. O'Brien, S. Reid, and S. Dubois
Effect of a Decision Aid on Knowledge and Treatment Decision Making for Breast Cancer Surgery: A Randomized Trial
JAMA,
July 28, 2004;
292(4):
435 - 441.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. W. Dibbins
Legacy
Arch Surg,
April 1, 2004;
139(4):
362 - 365.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. N. Baxter, B. A. Virnig, S. B. Durham, and T. M. Tuttle
Trends in the Treatment of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast
J Natl Cancer Inst,
March 17, 2004;
96(6):
443 - 448.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. L. Keating, M. B. Landrum, J. Z. Ayanian, E. P. Winer, and E. Guadagnoli
Consultation With a Medical Oncologist Before Surgery and Type of Surgery Among Elderly Women With Early-Stage Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
December 15, 2003;
21(24):
4532 - 4539.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Polsky, J. S. Mandelblatt, J. C. Weeks, L. Venditti, Y.-T. Hwang, H. A. Glick, J. Hadley, and K. A. Schulman
Economic Evaluation of Breast Cancer Treatment: Considering the Value of Patient Choice
J. Clin. Oncol.,
March 15, 2003;
21(6):
1139 - 1146.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. L. Keating, E. Guadagnoli, M. B. Landrum, C. Borbas, and J. C. Weeks
Treatment Decision Making in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Should Surgeons Match Patients' Desired Level of Involvement?
J. Clin. Oncol.,
March 15, 2002;
20(6):
1473 - 1479.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Warren, M. L. Brown, M. P. Fay, N. Schussler, A. L. Potosky, and G. F. Riley
Costs of Treatment for Elderly Women With Early-Stage Breast Cancer in Fee-for-Service Settings
J. Clin. Oncol.,
January 1, 2002;
20(1):
307 - 316.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. L. Staradub and M. Morrow
Modified Radical Mastectomy With Knife Technique
Arch Surg,
January 1, 2002;
137(1):
105 - 110.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. I. Gregorio, M. Kulldorff, L. Barry, H. Samocuik, and K. Zarfos
Geographical Differences in Primary Therapy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer
Ann. Surg. Oncol.,
December 1, 2001;
8(10):
844 - 849.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Morrow, J. White, J. Moughan, J. Owen, T. Pajack, J. Sylvester, J. Frank Wilson, and D. Winchester
Factors Predicting the Use of Breast-Conserving Therapy in Stage I and II Breast Carcinoma
J. Clin. Oncol.,
April 15, 2001;
19(8):
2254 - 2262.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. E. Hillner, T. J. Smith, and C. E. Desch
Hospital and Physician Volume or Specialization and Outcomes in Cancer Treatment: Importance in Quality of Cancer Care
J. Clin. Oncol.,
June 11, 2000;
18(11):
2327 - 2340.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. J. Burstein, S. Gelber, E. Guadagnoli, and J. C. Weeks
Use of Alternative Medicine by Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med.,
June 3, 1999;
340(22):
1733 - 1739.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. F. Riley, A. L. Potosky, C. N. Klabunde, J. L. Warren, and R. Ballard-Barbash
Stage at Diagnosis and Treatment Patterns Among Older Women With Breast Cancer: An HMO and Fee-for-Service Comparison
JAMA,
February 24, 1999;
281(8):
720 - 726.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|