Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moog, F.
Right arrow Articles by Reske, S. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moog, F.
Right arrow Articles by Reske, S. N.

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 16, 603-609, Copyright © 1998 by American Society of Clinical Oncology


ARTICLES

18-F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography as a new approach to detect lymphomatous bone marrow

F Moog, M Bangerter, J Kotzerke, A Guhlmann, N Frickhofen and SN Reske
Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Ulm, Germany.

PURPOSE: Bone marrow involvement in patients with malignant lymphoma is considered a sign of generalized disease with less favorable prognosis. Bone marrow biopsy (BMB), which represents the standard diagnostic procedure, however, is associated with a high rate of false-negative findings, which may lead to errors in management. The present study was undertaken to investigate the efficacy of positron emission tomography (PET) with 18-F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) as a new method to evaluate bone marrow involvement in patients with malignant lymphoma. METHODS: Seventy-eight consecutive, untreated patients with either non- Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL; n = 39) or Hodgkin's disease (HD; n = 39) were prospectively evaluated. Static FDG-PET imaging was performed following application of 270 MBq (F-18)-FDG. Attenuation correction was performed in 63 of 78 patients. Visual evaluation was performed by two examiners unaware of the clinical data. Material for BMB (70 bilateral, 8 unilateral) was obtained from the posterior iliac crest. Discordant results of PET and biopsy were settled, when possible, on the basis of further biopsy or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). RESULTS: In addition to seven concordant positive and 57 concordant negative findings, biopsy revealed another four cases with bone marrow involvement not detectable by FDG-PET analysis (+5.1%). On the contrary, PET showed bone marrow areas of intensive FDG uptake that suggested bone marrow lymphoma in 10 patients with negative biopsies (+12.8%). In eight patients, FDG-PET findings were confirmed by either histologic verification (n = 4), MRI (n = 2), polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for rearranged immunoglobulin H sequences (n = 1), or clinical presentation (n = 1). Two cases remained unresolved. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that FDG-PET has a high potential to detect bone marrow involvement in malignant lymphoma. Besides confirming lesions found at BMB, FDG-PET provided additional information, which, in eight of 78 patients (10.3%), led to an upgrade of the tumor stage.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
Y. S. Jhanwar and D. J. Straus
The Role of PET in Lymphoma
J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2006; 47(8): 1326 - 1334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ASH Education BookHome page
M. E. Juweid
Utility of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Scanning in Managing Patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma
Hematology, January 1, 2006; 2006(1): 259 - 265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
E. Even-Sapir
Imaging of Malignant Bone Involvement by Morphologic, Scintigraphic, and Hybrid Modalities
J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2005; 46(8): 1356 - 1367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
H. Schoder, A. Noy, M. Gonen, L. Weng, D. Green, Y. E. Erdi, S. M. Larson, and H. W.D. Yeung
Intensity of 18Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake in Positron Emission Tomography Distinguishes Between Indolent and Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
J. Clin. Oncol., July 20, 2005; 23(21): 4643 - 4651.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
E. E. Pakos, A. D. Fotopoulos, and J. P.A. Ioannidis
18F-FDG PET for Evaluation of Bone Marrow Infiltration in Staging of Lymphoma: A Meta-Analysis
J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2005; 46(6): 958 - 963.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
T. Kazama, S. C. Faria, V. Varavithya, S. Phongkitkarun, H. Ito, and H. A. Macapinlac
FDG PET in the Evaluation of Treatment for Lymphoma: Clinical Usefulness and Pitfalls
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2005; 25(1): 191 - 207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
N. G. Schaefer, T. F. Hany, C. Taverna, B. Seifert, K. D. M. Stumpe, G. K. von Schulthess, and G. W. Goerres
Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma and Hodgkin Disease: Coregistered FDG PET and CT at Staging and Restaging--Do We Need Contrast-enhanced CT?
Radiology, September 1, 2004; 232(3): 823 - 829.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. M. Rohren, T. G. Turkington, and R. E. Coleman
Clinical Applications of PET in Oncology
Radiology, May 1, 2004; 231(2): 305 - 332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
J. W. Friedberg and V. Chengazi
PET Scans in the Staging of Lymphoma: Current Status
Oncologist, October 1, 2003; 8(5): 438 - 447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
M. Wagner, U. Seitz, A. Buck, B. Neumaier, S. Schultheiss, M. Bangerter, M. Bommer, F. Leithauser, E. Wawra, G. Munzert, et al.
3'-[18F]Fluoro-3'-Deoxythymidine ([18F]-FLT) as Positron Emission Tomography Tracer for Imaging Proliferation in a Murine B-Cell Lymphoma Model and in the Human Disease
Cancer Res., May 15, 2003; 63(10): 2681 - 2687.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
L. Kostakoglu, H. Agress Jr, and S. J. Goldsmith
Clinical Role of FDG PET in Evaluation of Cancer Patients
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2003; 23(2): 315 - 340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
P. K. Thanos, N. B. Taintor, D. Alexoff, P. Vaska, J. Logan, D. K. Grandy, Y. Fang, J.-H. Lee, J. S. Fowler, and N. D. Volkow
In Vivo Comparative Imaging of Dopamine D2 Knockout and Wild-Type Mice with 11C-Raclopride and MicroPET
J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2002; 43(11): 1570 - 1577.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
S F Barrington
Whole body applications of positron emission tomography in oncology
Imaging, September 1, 2001; 13(3): 185 - 196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
H. Schoder, J. Meta, C. Yap, M. Ariannejad, J. Rao, M. E. Phelps, P. E. Valk, J. Sayre, and J. Czernin
Effect of Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET Imaging on Clinical Staging and Management of Patients with Malignant Lymphoma
J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2001; 42(8): 1139 - 1143.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
G. M. Segall
FDG PET Imaging in Patients with Lymphoma: A Clinical Perspective
J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2001; 42(4): 609 - 610.
[Full Text]


Home page
JNMHome page
E. Sutinen, S. Jyrkkio, M. Varpula, P. Lindholm, T. Gronroos, P. Lehikoinen, M. Teras, and H. Minn
Nodal Staging of Lymphoma with Whole-Body PET: Comparison of [11C]Methionine and FDG
J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2000; 41(12): 1980 - 1988.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 1998 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online