Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO Subscriptions PDA Services My JCO Customer Service

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Graefen, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kattan, M. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Graefen, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kattan, M. W.
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 20, Issue 15 (August), 2002: 3206-3212
© 2002 American Society for Clinical Oncology

International Validation of a Preoperative Nomogram for Prostate Cancer Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy

By Markus Graefen, Pierre I. Karakiewicz, Ilias Cagiannos, David I. Quinn, Susan M. Henshall, John J. Grygiel, Robert L. Sutherland, Phillip D. Stricker, Eric Klein, Patrick Kupelian, Donald G. Skinner, Gary Lieskovsky, Bernard Bochner, Hartwig Huland, Peter G. Hammerer, Alexander Haese, Andreas Erbersdobler, James A. Eastham, Jean de Kernion, Thomas Cangiano, Fritz H. Schröder, Mark F. Wildhagen, Theo H. van der Kwast, Peter T. Scardino, Michael W. Kattan

From the Departments of Urology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Garvan Institute of Medical Research and St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; University of Southern California, and University of California, Los Angeles, CA; University Hospital, Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Louisiana State University Health Science Center, Shreveport, LA; and Department of Urology, Erasmus University, and Academic Hospital Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Address reprint requests to Michael W. Kattan, PhD, Departments of Urology, Epidemiology, and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021; email: kattanm{at}mskcc.org

PURPOSE: We evaluated the predictive accuracy of a recently published preoperative nomogram for prostate cancer that predicts 5-year freedom from recurrence. We applied this nomogram to patients from seven different institutions spanning three continents.

METHODS: Clinical data of 6,754 patients were supplied for validation, and 6,232 complete records were used. Nomogram-predicted probabilities of 60-month freedom from recurrence were compared with actual follow-up in two ways. First, areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were determined for the entire data set according to several variables, including the institution where treatment was delivered. Second, nomogram classification–based risk quadrants were compared with actual Kaplan-Meier plots.

RESULTS: The AUC for all institutions combined was 0.75, with individual institution AUCs ranging from 0.67 to 0.83. Nomogram predictions for each risk quadrant were similar to actual freedom from recurrence rates: predicted probabilities of 87% (low-risk group), 64% (intermediate-low–risk group), 39% (intermediate-high–risk group), and 14% (high-risk group) corresponded to actual rates of 86%, 64%, 42%, and 17%, respectively. The use of neoadjuvant therapy, variation in the prostate-specific antigen recurrence definitions between institutions, and minor differences in the way the Gleason grade was reported did not substantially affect the predictive accuracy of the nomogram.

CONCLUSION: The nomogram is accurate when applied at international treatment institutions with similar patient selection and management strategies. Despite the potential for heterogeneity in patient selection and management, most predictions demonstrated high concordance with actual observations. Our results demonstrate that accurate predictions may be expected across different patient populations.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. F. Shariat, J. A. Karam, J. Walz, C. G. Roehrborn, F. Montorsi, V. Margulis, F. Saad, K. M. Slawin, and P. I. Karakiewicz
Improved Prediction of Disease Relapse after Radical Prostatectomy through a Panel of Preoperative Blood-Based Biomarkers
Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2008; 14(12): 3785 - 3791.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. F. Shariat, J. Walz, C. G. Roehrborn, A. R. Zlotta, P. Perrotte, N. Suardi, F. Saad, and P. I. Karakiewicz
External Validation of a Biomarker-Based Preoperative Nomogram Predicts Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy
J. Clin. Oncol., March 20, 2008; 26(9): 1526 - 1531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
A. S. Bjartell, H. Al-Ahmadie, A. M. Serio, J. A. Eastham, S. E. Eggener, S. W. Fine, L. Udby, W. L. Gerald, A. J. Vickers, H. Lilja, et al.
Association of Cysteine-Rich Secretory Protein 3 and {beta}-Microseminoprotein with Outcome after Radical Prostatectomy
Clin. Cancer Res., July 15, 2007; 13(14): 4130 - 4138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
A. J. Stephenson, P. T. Scardino, M. W. Kattan, T. M. Pisansky, K. M. Slawin, E. A. Klein, M. S. Anscher, J. M. Michalski, H. M. Sandler, D. W. Lin, et al.
Predicting the Outcome of Salvage Radiation Therapy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy
J. Clin. Oncol., May 20, 2007; 25(15): 2035 - 2041.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. Wang, H. Hricak, M. W. Kattan, H. N. Chen, K. Kuroiwa, H. F. Eisenberg, and P. T. Scardino
Prediction of Seminal Vesicle Invasion in Prostate Cancer: Incremental Value of Adding Endorectal MR Imaging to the Kattan Nomogram
Radiology, December 1, 2006; 242(1): 182 - 188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
L. True, I. Coleman, S. Hawley, C.-Y. Huang, D. Gifford, R. Coleman, T. M. Beer, E. Gelmann, M. Datta, E. Mostaghel, et al.
A molecular correlate to the Gleason grading system for prostate adenocarcinoma
PNAS, July 18, 2006; 103(29): 10991 - 10996.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
A. J. Stephenson, P. T. Scardino, J. A. Eastham, F. J. Bianco Jr., Z. A. Dotan, P. A. Fearn, and M. W. Kattan
Preoperative nomogram predicting the 10-year probability of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
J Natl Cancer Inst, May 17, 2006; 98(10): 715 - 717.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Wang, H. Hricak, M. W. Kattan, L. H. Schwartz, S. C. Eberhardt, H.-N. Chen, and P. T. Scardino
Combined endorectal and phased-array MRI in the prediction of pelvic lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer.
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2006; 186(3): 743 - 748.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
M. S. Anscher
PSA Kinetics and Risk of Death From Prostate Cancer: In Search of the Holy Grail of Surrogate End Points
JAMA, July 27, 2005; 294(4): 493 - 494.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
D. A. Loblaw, D. S. Mendelson, J. A. Talcott, K. S. Virgo, M. R. Somerfield, E. Ben-Josef, R. Middleton, H. Porterfield, S. A. Sharp, T. J. Smith, et al.
American Society of Clinical Oncology Recommendations for the Initial Hormonal Management of Androgen-Sensitive Metastatic, Recurrent, or Progressive Prostate Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., July 15, 2004; 22(14): 2927 - 2941.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. Wang, M. Mullerad, H.-N. Chen, S. C. Eberhardt, M. W. Kattan, P. T. Scardino, and H. Hricak
Prostate Cancer: Incremental Value of Endorectal MR Imaging Findings for Prediction of Extracapsular Extension
Radiology, July 1, 2004; 232(1): 133 - 139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
L. G. Horvath, S. M. Henshall, J. G. Kench, D. N. Saunders, C.-S. Lee, D. Golovsky, P. C. Brenner, G. F. O'Neill, R. Kooner, P. D. Stricker, et al.
Membranous Expression of Secreted Frizzled-Related Protein 4 Predicts for Good Prognosis in Localized Prostate Cancer and Inhibits PC3 Cellular Proliferation in Vitro
Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2004; 10(2): 615 - 625.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. W. Kattan, S. F. Shariat, B. Andrews, K. Zhu, E. Canto, K. Matsumoto, M. Muramoto, P. T. Scardino, M. Ohori, T. M. Wheeler, et al.
The Addition of Interleukin-6 Soluble Receptor and Transforming Growth Factor Beta1 Improves a Preoperative Nomogram for Predicting Biochemical Progression in Patients With Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., October 1, 2003; 21(19): 3573 - 3579.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. W. Kattan, M. S. Karpeh, M. Mazumdar, and M. F. Brennan
Postoperative Nomogram for Disease-Specific Survival After an R0 Resection for Gastric Carcinoma
J. Clin. Oncol., October 1, 2003; 21(19): 3647 - 3650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
S R J Bott, A J Birtle, C J Taylor, and R S Kirby
Prostate cancer management: (1) an update on localised disease
Postgrad. Med. J., October 1, 2003; 79(936): 575 - 580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
A. V. D'Amico
Predicting Prostate-Specific Antigen Recurrence Established: Now, Who Will Survive?
J. Clin. Oncol., August 1, 2002; 20(15): 3188 - 3190.
[Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 Site Map

Copyright © 2002 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online