Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2002.06.029 on July 1 2002
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 20, Issue 15
(August), 2002: 3328-3343
© 2002 American Society for Clinical Oncology
American Society of Clinical Oncology Technology Assessment of Pharmacologic Interventions for Breast Cancer Risk Reduction Including Tamoxifen, Raloxifene, and Aromatase Inhibition
By Rowan T. Chlebowski,
Nananda Col,
Eric P. Winer,
Deborah E. Collyar,
Steven R. Cummings,
Victor G. Vogel, III,
Harold J. Burstein,
Andrea Eisen,
Isaac Lipkus,
David G. Pfister for the American Society of Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer Technology Assessment Working Group
From the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA.
Address reprint requests to American Society of Clinical Oncology, Health Services Research Department, 1900 Duke St, Suite 200, Alexandria, VA 22314; email: guidelines{at}asco.orgThis article was published online ahead of print at www.jco.org.
OBJECTIVE: To update an evidence-based technology assessment of chemoprevention strategies for breast cancer risk reduction.
POTENTIAL INTERVENTIONS: Tamoxifen, raloxifene, aromatase inhibition, and fenretinide.
OUTCOMES: Outcomes of interest include breast cancer incidence, breast cancerspecific survival, overall survival, and net health benefit.
EVIDENCE: A comprehensive, formal literature review was conducted for relevant topics. Testimony was collected from invited experts and interested parties. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) prescribed technology assessment procedure was followed.
VALUES: More weight was given to published randomized trials.
BENEFITS/HARMS: A womans decision regarding breast cancer risk reduction strategies is complex and will depend on the importance and weight attributed to information regarding both cancer- and noncancer-related risks and benefits.
CONCLUSIONS: For women with a defined 5-year projected breast cancer risk of 1.66%, tamoxifen (at 20 mg/d for 5 years) may be offered to reduce their risk. Risk/benefit models suggest that greatest clinical benefit with least side effects is derived from use of tamoxifen in younger (premenopausal) women (who are less likely to have thromboembolic sequelae and uterine cancer), women without a uterus, and women at higher breast cancer risk. Data do not as yet suggest that tamoxifen provides an overall health benefit or increases survival. In all circumstances, tamoxifen use should be discussed as part of an informed decision-making process with careful consideration of individually calculated risks and benefits. Use of tamoxifen combined with hormone replacement therapy or use of raloxifene, any aromatase inhibitor or inactivator, or fenretinide to lower the risk of developing breast cancer is not recommended outside of a clinical trial setting. This technology assessment represents an ongoing process and recommendations will be updated in a timely matter.
VALIDATION: The conclusions were endorsed by the ASCO Health Services Research Committee and the ASCO Board of Directors.
SPONSOR: American Society of Clinical Oncology.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. D. Kauff, S. M. Domchek, T. M. Friebel, M. E. Robson, J. Lee, J. E. Garber, C. Isaacs, D. G. Evans, H. Lynch, R. A. Eeles, et al.
Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy for the Prevention of BRCA1- and BRCA2-Associated Breast and Gynecologic Cancer: A Multicenter, Prospective Study
J. Clin. Oncol.,
March 10, 2008;
26(8):
1331 - 1337.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. T. Chlebowski, G. L. Anderson, D. S. Lane, A. K. Aragaki, T. Rohan, S. Yasmeen, G. Sarto, C. A. Rosenberg, F. A. Hubbell, and For the Women's Health Initiative Investigators
Predicting Risk of Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women by Hormone Receptor Status
J Natl Cancer Inst,
November 21, 2007;
99(22):
1695 - 1705.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. K. Kuhl
Current Status of Breast MR Imaging * Part 2. Clinical Applications
Radiology,
September 1, 2007;
244(3):
672 - 691.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Armstrong, E. Moye, S. Williams, J. A. Berlin, and E. E. Reynolds
Screening Mammography in Women 40 to 49 Years of Age: A Systematic Review for the American College of Physicians
Ann Intern Med,
April 3, 2007;
146(7):
516 - 526.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Padron, L. Li, E. M. Kofoed, and F. Schaufele
Ligand-Selective Interdomain Conformations of Estrogen Receptor-{alpha}
Mol. Endocrinol.,
January 1, 2007;
21(1):
49 - 61.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Armstrong, D. A. Quistberg, E. Micco, S. Domchek, and C. Guerra
Prescription of tamoxifen for breast cancer prevention by primary care physicians.
Arch Intern Med,
November 13, 2006;
166(20):
2260 - 2265.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-I. Huh, A. Calvo, R. Charles, and J. E. Green
Distinct tumor stage-specific inhibitory effects of 2-methoxyestradiol in a breast cancer mouse model associated with id-1 expression.
Cancer Res.,
April 1, 2006;
66(7):
3495 - 3503.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. U. Buzdar
Dietary Modification and Risk of Breast Cancer
JAMA,
February 8, 2006;
295(6):
691 - 692.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Gogas, C. Markopoulos, and R. Blamey
Should women be advised to take prophylactic endocrine treatment outside of a clinical trial setting?
Ann. Onc.,
December 1, 2005;
16(12):
1861 - 1866.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. S. Komm, Y. P. Kharode, P. V. N. Bodine, H. A. Harris, C. P. Miller, and C. R. Lyttle
Bazedoxifene Acetate: A Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulator with Improved Selectivity
Endocrinology,
September 1, 2005;
146(9):
3999 - 4008.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J. Santen and R. Mansel
Benign Breast Disorders
N. Engl. J. Med.,
July 21, 2005;
353(3):
275 - 285.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. P. Winer, C. Hudis, H. J. Burstein, A. C. Wolff, K. I. Pritchard, J. N. Ingle, R. T. Chlebowski, R. Gelber, S. B. Edge, J. Gralow, et al.
American Society of Clinical Oncology Technology Assessment on the Use of Aromatase Inhibitors As Adjuvant Therapy for Postmenopausal Women With Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: Status Report 2004
J. Clin. Oncol.,
January 20, 2005;
23(3):
619 - 629.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. N. Ingle
Endocrine Therapy Trials of Aromatase Inhibitors for Breast Cancer in the Adjuvant and Prevention Settings
Clin. Cancer Res.,
January 15, 2005;
11(2):
900s - 905s.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. K. Dunn, D. L. Wickerham, and L. G. Ford
Prevention of Hormone-Related Cancers: Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
January 10, 2005;
23(2):
357 - 367.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. Zierau, J. O'Sullivan, C. Morrissey, D. McDonald, W. Wunsche, M. R Schneider, M. P Tenniswood, and G. Vollmer
Tamoxifen exerts agonistic effects on clusterin and complement C3 gene expression in RUCA-I primary xenografts and metastases but not normal uterus
Endocr. Relat. Cancer,
December 1, 2004;
11(4):
823 - 830.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. D. Bushnell and L. B. Goldstein
Risk of ischemic stroke with tamoxifen treatment for breast cancer: A meta-analysis
Neurology,
October 12, 2004;
63(7):
1230 - 1233.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Breast Cancer
Obstet. Gynecol.,
October 1, 2004;
104(4_suppl):
11S - 16S.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Venous Thromboembolic Disease
Obstet. Gynecol.,
October 1, 2004;
104(4_suppl):
118S - 127S.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N Angelopoulos, V Barbounis, S Livadas, D Kaltsas, and G Tolis
Effects of estrogen deprivation due to breast cancer treatment
Endocr. Relat. Cancer,
September 1, 2004;
11(3):
523 - 535.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S.-Y. Tsang, X. Yao, F. L. Chan, C.-M. Wong, Z.-Y. Chen, I. Laher, and Y. Huang
Estrogen and Tamoxifen Modulate Cerebrovascular Tone in Ovariectomized Female Rats
Hypertension,
July 1, 2004;
44(1):
78 - 82.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. B. Bouker, T. C. Skaar, D. R. Fernandez, K. A. O'Brien, R. B. Riggins, D. Cao, and R. Clarke
Interferon Regulatory Factor-1 Mediates the Proapoptotic but Not Cell Cycle Arrest Effects of the Steroidal Antiestrogen ICI 182,780 (Faslodex, Fulvestrant)
Cancer Res.,
June 1, 2004;
64(11):
4030 - 4039.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Cuzick, A. Buzdar, M. Baum, R. Bianco, R. Coleman, M. Constenla, W. Distler, M. Dowsett, J. Forbes, J. P. Guastalla, et al.
Adjuvant Use of Anastrozole in Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
April 15, 2004;
22(8):
1524 - 1526.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. C. Hartmann, A. Degnim, and D. J. Schaid
Prophylactic Mastectomy for BRCA1/2 Carriers: Progress and More Questions
J. Clin. Oncol.,
March 15, 2004;
22(6):
981 - 983.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Barzon, M. Boscaro, and G. Palu
Endocrine Aspects of Cancer Gene Therapy
Endocr. Rev.,
February 1, 2004;
25(1):
1 - 44.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. E. Goss and K. Strasser-Weippl
Prevention Strategies with Aromatase Inhibitors
Clin. Cancer Res.,
January 1, 2004;
10(1):
372S - 379S.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. T. Chlebowski, S. L. Hendrix, R. D. Langer, M. L. Stefanick, M. Gass, D. Lane, R. J. Rodabough, M. A. Gilligan, M. G. Cyr, C. A. Thomson, et al.
Influence of Estrogen Plus Progestin on Breast Cancer and Mammography in Healthy Postmenopausal Women: The Women's Health Initiative Randomized Trial
JAMA,
June 25, 2003;
289(24):
3243 - 3253.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Meijers-Heijboer, C. T.M. Brekelmans, M. Menke-Pluymers, C. Seynaeve, A. Baalbergen, C. Burger, E. Crepin, A. W.M. van den Ouweland, B. van Geel, and J. G.M. Klijn
Use of Genetic Testing and Prophylactic Mastectomy and Oophorectomy in Women With Breast or Ovarian Cancer From Families With a BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation
J. Clin. Oncol.,
May 1, 2003;
21(9):
1675 - 1681.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. L. Riggs and L. C. Hartmann
Selective Estrogen-Receptor Modulators -- Mechanisms of Action and Application to Clinical Practice
N. Engl. J. Med.,
February 13, 2003;
348(7):
618 - 629.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. G. Vogel and S. Lo
Preventing Hormone-Dependent Breast Cancer in High-Risk Women
J Natl Cancer Inst,
January 15, 2003;
95(2):
91 - 93.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. T. Chlebowski and A. McTiernan
Biological Significance of Interventions That Change Breast Density
J Natl Cancer Inst,
January 1, 2003;
95(1):
4 - 5.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. G. Vogel, J. P. Costantino, D. L. Wickerham, and W. M. Cronin
National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Update: Prevention Trials and Endocrine Therapy of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ
Clin. Cancer Res.,
January 1, 2003;
9(1):
495S - 501S.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. P. Winer, C. Hudis, H. J. Burstein, R. T. Chlebowski, J. N. Ingle, S. B. Edge, E. P. Mamounas, J. Gralow, L. J. Goldstein, K. I. Pritchard, et al.
American Society of Clinical Oncology Technology Assessment on the Use of Aromatase Inhibitors as Adjuvant Therapy for Women With Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: Status Report 2002
J. Clin. Oncol.,
August 1, 2002;
20(15):
3317 - 3327.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|