This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Save to my personal folders Download to citation manager Rights & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Google Scholar Articles by Jefford, M. Articles by Schofield, P. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Jefford, M. Articles by Schofield, P. Related Articles Related Editorial

Tailored Chemotherapy Information Faxed to General Practitioners Improves Confidence in Managing Adverse Effects and Satisfaction With Shared Care: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial

Michael Jefford, Carl Baravelli, Paul Dudgeon, Adrian Dabscheck, Melanie Evans, Michael Moloney, Penelope Schofield

From the Supportive Care Research Group, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre; Division of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre; Pharmacy, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre; Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

Corresponding author: Michael Jefford, MBBS, MPH, MHlthServMt, PhD, FRACP, Division of Haematology and Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag 1, A’Beckett St, Victoria 8006, Australia; e-mail: Michael.Jefford{at}petermac.org

Purpose: General practitioners (GPs) play a critical role in the treatment of patients with cancer; yet often lack information for optimal care. We developed standardized information for GPs about chemotherapy (CT). In a randomized controlled trial we assessed the impact of sending, by fax, information tailored to the particular patient's CT regimen. Primary end points were: confidence treating patients who were receiving CT (confidence), knowledge of adverse effects and reasons to refer the patient to the treatment center (knowledge), and satisfaction with information and shared care of patients (satisfaction).

Methods: Focus group work informed the development of the CT information which focused on potential adverse effects and recommended management strategies. GPs of patients due to commence CT were randomly assigned to receive usual correspondence with or without the faxed patient/regimen-specific information. Telephone questionnaire at baseline and 1 week postintervention assessed knowledge, confidence, and satisfaction.

Results: Ninety-seven GPs managed 97 patients receiving 23 types of CT. Eighty-one (83.5%) completed the follow-up questionnaire. GPs in the intervention group demonstrated a significantly greater increase in confidence (mean difference, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.47) and satisfaction (mean difference, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.88) compared with usual care, reflecting a 7.1% and 10.5% difference in score, respectively. No differences were detected for knowledge. GPs receiving the CT sheet found correspondence significantly more useful (P < .001) and instructive (P < .001) than GPs who received standard correspondence alone.

Conclusion: Information about CT faxed to GPs is a simple, inexpensive intervention that increases confidence managing CT adverse effects and satisfaction with shared care. This intervention could have widespread application.

Supported by unrestricted educational grant from Roche Products (Australia).

Presented in part at the 43rd Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, June 1-5, 2007, Chicago, IL.

Authors’ disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

Related Editorial

• Primary Care Physicians and Oncologists Are Players on the Same Team
  Eva Grunfeld
  JCO 2008 26: 2246-2247 [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Grunfeld Primary Care Physicians and Oncologists Are Players on the Same Team J. Clin. Oncol., May 10, 2008; 26(14): 2246 - 2247. [Full Text] [PDF]