Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 5, 1663-1669, Copyright © 1987 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
Comparison of spinal magnetic resonance imaging and myelography in cancer patients
C Hagenau, W Grosh, M Currie and RG Wiley
Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37212.
Spinal involvement by systemic malignancy is common, and often leads to
extradural compression of the spinal cord and/or nerve roots by metastases.
Rapid, anatomically accurate diagnosis is essential to the successful
management of these patients. We compared spinal magnetic resonance imaging
(MRI) with conventional myelography in a series of 31 cancer patients being
evaluated for myelopathy (N = 10), or back/radicular pain (N = 21). All
patients were evaluated between April 1985 and July 1986, and underwent
both studies within ten days of each other (median, two days). MRI was
performed on a 0.5 Tesla Technicare unit with a body surface coil, and
results compared with standard contrast myelography. All studies were
reviewed separately and in a "blinded" fashion. MRI and myelography were
comparable in detecting large lesions that produced complete subarachnoid
block (five of ten patients with myelopathy, three of twenty-one patients
with back/radicular pain). In 19 of 31 patients, smaller but clinically
significant extradural lesions were found. In nine of 19 cases, these
lesions were demonstrated equally well by both modalities; in nine of 19
cases, these lesions were demonstrated by myelography alone; in one of 19,
a lesion was demonstrated by MRI alone. Given our current technology,
myelography appeared superior to MRI as a single imaging modality. However,
MRI may be an alternative in patients where total myelography is
technically impossible or unusually hazardous.