Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 26, No 13 (May 1), 2008: pp. 2234-a
© 2008 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.0481

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lu, K. H.
Right arrow Articles by Broaddus, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lu, K. H.
Right arrow Articles by Broaddus, R. R.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Correspondence

CORRESPONDENCE

In Reply

Karen H. Lu, Molly Daniels, Russell R. Broaddus

The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

In the letter from Blumenthal and Dennis, the possibility of Cowden syndrome is raised as an additional hereditary cancer syndrome that may account for some of the endometrial cancers in our cohort of women younger than age 50 years. Although we did not perform PTEN germline mutation analysis, we did obtain a thorough three-generation pedigree, and there were no women who had personal or family histories of cancer suggestive of Cowden syndrome. In addition, whereas a targeted physical examination evaluating signs of Cowden syndrome including macrocephaly and mucocutaneous lesions was not performed, we did ask patients to self-report relevant skin lesions. Although not a primary goal of our study, our group did not identify any women in whom Cowden syndrome was suspected. Future studies that include evaluation for germline PTEN mutations will be necessary to determine the prevalence of Cowden syndrome in such a cohort of young women with endometrial cancer.

In terms of evaluating tumors for somatic PTEN mutations, there are currently no clinical indications for such testing. Somatic PTEN mutations remain the most frequent molecular abnormality in endometrioid endometrial cancers. Our group and others are evaluating Akt/mTOR inhibitors for the treatment of advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer, and additional work is necessary to determine if somatic PTEN mutation status is a biomarker of response.


Related Correspondence

  • Germline PTEN Mutations As a Cause of Early-Onset Endometrial Cancer
    Gideon M. Blumenthal and Phillip A. Dennis
    JCO 2008 26: 2234 [Full Text]



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lu, K. H.
Right arrow Articles by Broaddus, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lu, K. H.
Right arrow Articles by Broaddus, R. R.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Correspondence

About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online