Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 26, No 6 (February 20), 2008: pp. 825-827
© 2008 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.9583

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Backlund, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, D. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Backlund, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, D. H.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Article

EDITORIAL

Novel Strategies for the Treatment of Lung Cancer: Modulation of Eicosanoids

Michael G. Backlund, Joseph M. Amann, David H. Johnson

Departments of Medicine and Cancer Biology, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN

Given that lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States,1 one might question the value of the last three decades of basic and clinical research in this disease. Indeed, although modern platinum-based chemotherapy regimens can double the median survival of non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients diagnosed with advanced disease, few patients survive beyond 2 years, and curative therapy remains elusive.2 In fact, one might further assert that most of the survival improvement beyond that achieved with supportive care alone was realized almost 20 years ago with the introduction of cisplatin into standard care, and that little has changed since that time.3,4 Fortunately, the pace of therapeutic progress appears to be accelerating, driven in large part by our improved (and improving) knowledge of lung cancer biology.5 This knowledge has led to the initiation of seminal studies employing so-called targeted therapy that have yielded clear survival benefits in patients with advanced NSCLC.6,7

Encouraged by the aforementioned successes, investigators continue to focus on exploiting key molecular targets that have the potential to enhance therapeutic outcome.5 One area of particular interest involves the eicosanoids—prostaglandins (PG), prostacyclins, thromboxanes (Tx), and leukotrienes (LT)—which are signaling molecules generated through the oxygenation of arachidonic acid.8-10 They exert complex control over many bodily systems, mainly in inflammation or immunity, and act as messengers in the CNS. Recently, a number of preclinical, clinical, and pharmacologic studies have documented the importance of eicosanoids in the development of many cancers, including NSCLC.8-10 For example, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), one of two isoforms of COX that catalyzes the conversion of arachidonic acid to prostaglandin PGG2, is frequently upregulated in NSCLC.8,9 PGG2 is subsequently reduced to PGH2, an unstable endoperoxide intermediate. Specific PG synthases metabolize PGH2 to at least five structurally related bioactive lipid molecules: PGE2, PGD2, PGF2{alpha}, PGI2, and TxA2.10 In turn, COX-2–derived PGE2 can stimulate cellular proliferation and angiogenesis, reduce apoptosis, enhance cellular invasiveness, and inhibit immune surveillance. Each of these contributes to the pathogenesis and progression of NSCLC.8-10 Strategies designed to decrease PGE2 production are therefore thought to represent possible therapeutic options in NSCLC.

In this issue of the Journal of Clinical Oncology, Edelman et al11 report the results of Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) trial 30203 in which patients with advanced NSCLC were randomly assigned to receive a standard platinum-based chemotherapy plus celecoxib (a specific COX-2 inhibitor) or chemotherapy with zileuton (a 5-lipoxygenase [LOX] inhibitor), or chemotherapy with both celecoxib and zileuton. LOX is a key enzyme in the production of LT known to increase cellular proliferation, increase transcriptional activity of oncogenes, and decrease apoptosis.12 The overall results of this randomized phase II trial were not particularly encouraging as none of the treatment regimens increased overall survival compared with historical controls treated with chemotherapy alone. Consistent with previous reports,13 however, patients with tumors that expressed moderate to high COX-2 levels as assessed by immunohistochemistry had a poor prognosis. Moreover, treatment with chemotherapy plus celecoxib effected a superior survival in patients with high intratumoral COX-2 expression compared with their counterparts treated with chemotherapy alone. This finding is consistent with a recent report by Chan et al, who noted that regular aspirin use reduced the risk of colorectal cancers that overexpress COX-2 but not the risk of colorectal cancers with weak or absent expression of COX-2.14 These data collectively suggest that cancers expressing high COX-2 levels may be "addicted" to COX-2 enzymatic activity and therefore potentially more susceptible to COX-2 inhibitors.15 This is an eminently testable hypothesis. For example, patients with high intratumoral COX-2 levels might be randomly assigned to receive chemotherapy plus a COX-specific inhibitor or a placebo. Another option might be to select patients using a biomarker of intratumoral COX-2 because adequate tumor samples are not always readily available in lung cancer patients. To this end, we recently developed an assay to measure urinary 11{alpha}-hydroxy-9,15-dioxo-2,3,4,5-tetranor-prostane-1,20-dioic acid (PGE-M), the major metabolite of PGE2.16 We found that nonselective and selective inhibitors of COX-2 effectively decreased urinary PGE-M levels to a similar degree in healthy human participants and in individuals with NSCLC, indicating that a majority of PGE-M in humans, with or without an underlying malignancy, is COX-2 derived.16 We also found that a short course of moderately high-dose celecoxib (400 mg bid) resulted in a marked decrease in intratumoral PGE2 levels, with a concomitant decline in urinary PGE-M levels.17 Collectively, these data indicate that urinary PGE-M could be a useful biomarker of intratumoral COX-2 activity and PGE2 production in NSCLC.

In addition to upregulation of COX-2,18,19 there is mounting evidence that several COX-2–independent genes involved in eicosanoid biosynthesis and signal transduction also might be viable drug targets for in lung cancer. For example, high expression of the microsomal form of PGE synthase (mPGES),20 the tissue-specific enzyme that preferentially converts PGH2 to PGE2, and downregulation of 15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (15-PGDH),21,22 which catalyzes the rate-limiting step of prostaglandin catabolism through enzymatic inactivation of PGE2, are alterations in the eicosanoid pathway frequently observed in NSCLC. Individually or collectively, these factors could lead to high or sustained levels of PGE2 and downstream signaling events that promote the development and growth of NSCLC.8-10 Drugs targeting these specific molecules or the specific receptors (EP1-4) through which PGE2 exerts its cellular effects could prove beneficial, but without the cardiovascular adverse effects observed with specific COX-2 inhibitors.23,24 Parenthetically, a potential benefit of targeting the biosynthetic and signaling pathways downstream of COX-2 is the availability of existing US Food and Drug Administration–approved drugs readily available for clinical testing. For example, erlotinib can increase the level of the PGE2 catabolic enzyme 15-PGDH in colorectal and selected lung cancer cell lines22,25; this observation may help explain why some lung cancers treated with erlotinib experience disease stabilization in the absence of an epidermal growth factor–activating mutation. Additionally, a recent retrospective study examining cancer rates among diabetics treated with thiazolidinediones (TZDs) found that lung cancer incidence rates were significantly lowered in TZD-treated compared with nontreated patients.26 The benefit derived from TZDs in this study could possibly be a result of off-target effects because both pioglitazone and rosiglitazone can reduce PGE2 levels by upregulating 15-PGDH expression in a peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor gamma-independent manner.27

In summary, the results of CALGB 30203 support the hypothesis that some NSCLCs are "addicted" to COX-2 enzymatic activity and strongly suggest that further studies are warranted. The data presented by Edelman et al support the need for a prospective study in which patients with advanced lung cancer are selected on the basis of COX-2 expression. Patients with high intratumoral COX-2 levels should be randomly assigned to receive a COX-specific inhibitor or placebo in combination with established chemotherapy regimens. We believe that the testing of COX-2-independent approaches, which offer a potentially lower risk of adverse cardiovascular effects, is warranted as well. The results of CALGB 30203 emphasize the need for additional studies examining eicosanoid modulation so that clinicians can determine more conclusively whether inhibition of this pathway can significantly improve overall survival of patients with NSCLC.

AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Although all authors completed the disclosure declaration, the following author(s) indicated a financial or other interest that is relevant to the subject matter under consideration in this article. Certain relationships marked with a "U" are those for which no compensation was received; those relationships marked with a "C" were compensated. For a detailed description of the disclosure categories, or for more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to the Author Disclosure Declaration and the Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest section in Information for Contributors.

Employment or Leadership Position: None Consultant or Advisory Role: David H. Johnson, Merck (C) Stock Ownership: None Honoraria: None Research Funding: None Expert Testimony: None Other Remuneration: None

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Manuscript writing: Michael G. Backlund, Joseph M. Amann, David H. Johnson

Final approval of manuscript: Michael G. Backlund, Joseph M. Amann, David H. Johnson

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grants No. CA68485 and CA90949 (Lung Specialized Programs of Research Excellence; D.H.J) and F32C130562 (M.G.B.).

REFERENCES

1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al: Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin 57:43-66, 2007[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Schiller JH, Harrington D, Belani CP, et al: Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 346:92-98, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Rapp E, Pater JL, Willan A, et al: Chemotherapy can prolong survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer–report of a Canadian multicenter randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 6:633-641, 1988[Abstract]

4. Breathnach OS, Freidlin B, Conley B, et al: Twenty-two years of phase III trials for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Sobering results. J Clin Oncol 19:1734-1742, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Sun S, Schiller JH, Spinola M, et al: New molecularly targeted therapies for lung cancer. J Clin Invest 117:2740-2750, 2007[CrossRef][Medline]

6. Shepherd FA, Rodrigues Pereira J, Ciuleanu T, et al: Erlotinib in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 353:123-132, 2005[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Sandler A, Gray R, Perry MC, et al: Paclitaxel-carboplatin alone or with bevacizumab for non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 355:2542-2550, 2006[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Brown JR, DuBois RN: Cyclooxygenase as a target in lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 10:4266s-4269s, 2004[CrossRef][Medline]

9. Krysan K, Reckamp KL, Sharma S, et al: The potential and rationale for COX-2 inhibitors in lung cancer. Anticancer Agents Med Chem 6:209-220, 2006[Medline]

10. Wang D, Dubois RN: Prostaglandins and cancer. Gut 55:115-122, 2006[Free Full Text]

11. Edelman MJ, Watson D, Wang X, et al: Eicosanoid modulation in advanced lung cancer: Cyclooxygenase-2 expression is a positive predictive factor for celecoxib + chemotherapy—Cancer and Leukemia Group B trial 30203. J Clin Oncol 26:848-855, 2008[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Peters-Golden M, Henderson WR Jr: Leukotrienes. N Engl J Med 357:1841-1854, 2007[Free Full Text]

13. Khuri FR, Wu H, Lee JJ, et al: Cyclooxygenase-2 overexpression is a marker of poor prognosis in stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 7:861-867, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Chan AT, Ogino S, Fuchs CS: Aspirin and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer in Relation to the Expression of COX-2. N Engl J Med 356:2131-2142, 2007[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Markowitz SD: Aspirin and Colon Cancer: Targeting Prevention? N Engl J Med 356:2195-2198, 2007[Free Full Text]

16. Murphey LJ, Williams MK, Sanchez SC, et al: Quantification of the major urinary metabolite of PGE2 by a liquid chromatographic/mass spectrometric assay: Determination of cyclooxygenase-specific PGE2 synthesis in healthy humans and those with lung cancer. Anal Biochem 334:266-275, 2004[CrossRef][Medline]

17. Csiki I, Morrow JD, Sandler A, et al: Targeting cyclooxygenase-2 in recurrent non-small cell lung cancer: A phase II trial of celecoxib and docetaxel. Clin Cancer Res 11:6634-6640, 2005[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Hida T, Yatabe Y, Achiwa H, et al: Increased expression of cyclooxygenase 2 occurs frequently in human lung cancers, specifically in adenocarcinomas. Cancer Res 58:3761-3764, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Wolff H, Saukkonen K, Anttila S, et al: Expression of cyclooxygenase-2 in human lung carcinoma. Cancer Res 58:4997-5001, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Yoshimatsu K, Altorki NK, Golijanin D, et al: Inducible prostaglandin E synthase is overexpressed in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 7:2669-2674, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Ding Y, Tong M, Liu S, et al: NAD+-linked 15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (15-PGDH) behaves as a tumor suppressor in lung cancer. Carcinogenesis 26:65-72, 2005[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Yang L, Amann JM, Kikuchi T, et al: Inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor signaling elevates 15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase in non-small-cell lung cancer. Cancer Res 67:5587-5593, 2007[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Fulton AM, Ma X, Kundu N: Targeting prostaglandin E EP receptors to inhibit metastasis. Cancer Res 66:9794-9797, 2006[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Yang L, Huang Y, Porta R, et al: Host and direct antitumor effects and profound reduction in tumor metastasis with selective EP4 receptor antagonism. Cancer Res 66:9665-9672, 2006[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Mann JR, Backlund MG, Buchanan FG, et al: Repression of prostaglandin dehydrogenase by epidermal growth factor and snail increases prostaglandin E2 and promotes cancer progression. Cancer Res 66:6649-6656, 2006[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Govindarajan R, Ratnasinghe L, Simmons DL, et al: Thiazolidinediones and the risk of lung, prostate, and colon cancer in patients with diabetes. J Clin Oncol 25:1476-1481, 2007[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Hazra S, Batra RK, Tai HH, et al: Pioglitazone and rosiglitazone decrease prostaglandin E2 in non-small-cell lung cancer cells by up-regulating 15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase. Mol Pharmacol 71:1715-1720, 2007[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Related Article

  • Eicosanoid Modulation in Advanced Lung Cancer: Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression Is a Positive Predictive Factor for Celecoxib + Chemotherapy—Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 30203
    Martin J. Edelman, Dee Watson, Xiaofei Wang, Carl Morrison, Robert A. Kratzke, Scott Jewell, Lydia Hodgson, Ann M. Mauer, Ajeet Gajra, Gregory A. Masters, Michelle Bedor, Everett E. Vokes, and Mark J. Green
    JCO 2008 26: 848-855 [Abstract] [Full Text]



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Backlund, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, D. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Backlund, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, D. H.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Article

About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online